Comparison Overview

Graphicsland, Inc.

VS

Rose City Label Co

Graphicsland, Inc.

18621 81st Ave, Tinley Park, Illinois, 60487, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

We Make Stickers! We're an online printing company that focuses not only on the customer's experience but also the employee's experience. We believe in hiring people that thrive on challenges and have a desire to learn. Our Values Do it before it needs to get done - do your future self a favor and work ahead of the deadline. Things can unexpectedly happen! We want to be prepared for if they do. Are you a procrastinator? If so, this company might not be for you. Empathize with the customer - We value our customers and want to help where we can, so we've got top-notch reprint policies in place for the assist. Our customers return because we make it right. We don't talk ill of any customers or designs, no matter the circumstance. Have a growth mindset - The same empathy goes for our employees. Everyone makes mistakes, which make great learning opportunities! Having a growth mindset is understanding we may not have the skill set yet, and that we can change, develop, learn and grow. Each employee is expected to have personal goals and we'll do whatever we can to help get them closer. We succeed and fail as a team - No matter the outcome, we remain side by side. There is no "they," only "we." We support one another through and through, whether we hit new records or hit a rough patch. We'll tackle the problems as a team and celebrate as one, too.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rose City Label Co

7235 Se Label Ln, Portland, OR, 97206, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

High quality custom printing for anyone with food, beverage, cannabis or industrial labels. State of the art equipment, nationally recognized sustainability programs, and family values set us apart. - HP Indigo digital quality - Foil Stamping and embossing - Long run industrial and food labels - Backed by 92 years of family service You can always trust Rose City Label to guide you through your custom label printing project.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphicsland-inc..jpeg
Graphicsland, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rose-city-label-co.jpeg
Rose City Label Co
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Graphicsland, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rose City Label Co
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graphicsland, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rose City Label Co in 2025.

Incident History — Graphicsland, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graphicsland, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rose City Label Co (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rose City Label Co cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphicsland-inc..jpeg
Graphicsland, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rose-city-label-co.jpeg
Rose City Label Co
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rose City Label Co company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Graphicsland, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rose City Label Co company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Graphicsland, Inc. company.

In the current year, Rose City Label Co company and Graphicsland, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rose City Label Co company nor Graphicsland, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rose City Label Co company nor Graphicsland, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rose City Label Co company nor Graphicsland, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Graphicsland, Inc. company nor Rose City Label Co company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Graphicsland, Inc. nor Rose City Label Co holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Graphicsland, Inc. company nor Rose City Label Co company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Graphicsland, Inc. company employs more people globally than Rose City Label Co company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Graphicsland, Inc. nor Rose City Label Co holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Graphicsland, Inc. nor Rose City Label Co holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Graphicsland, Inc. nor Rose City Label Co holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Graphicsland, Inc. nor Rose City Label Co holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Graphicsland, Inc. nor Rose City Label Co holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Graphicsland, Inc. nor Rose City Label Co holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N