Comparison Overview

graphics

VS

Handle Branding

graphics

US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Clippingpathmaster is an online Clipping Path service provider, which remove image background for web and print usage. We have professional graphic designers and deliver images in outstanding quality within 1-24 hours. All designers of Clippingpathmaster manually create Photoshop clipping path, masking, image retouching , web design, and desktop publishing software. Clippingpathmaster offers one ($1) US dollar any kinds of clipping path within 12 hours & Free trial for quality evaluation before sending a job.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1,499
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Handle Branding

5 Fleet Street, North Parramatta 2151, North Parramatta, New South Wales, 2151, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Handle is a branding and creative design agency dedicated to helping brands drive open honest relationships with their audience. We open the hearts and minds of the people through creative outcomes and experiences. By breaking down the barriers often found in communication we seek new opportunities, boundaries, and conversations. With an award-winning portfolio of projects, our work drives our ongoing clear thinking, straightforward communication, and considered execution in every challenge. Thought branding and design consultancy Handle are able to produce a diverse range of work spanning across identity, art direction, strategy branding, place making, spatial, web design and animation. We help our clients communicate their message clearly and intelligently, delivering design solutions and advice to a wide range of clients—from private corporate clients and Government organisations. Through engaging our clients as creative partners we are able to involve them in the conversation resulting in relevant and compelling solutions.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphics.jpeg
graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/handle-branding.jpeg
Handle Branding
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Handle Branding
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Handle Branding in 2025.

Incident History — graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Handle Branding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Handle Branding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphics.jpeg
graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/handle-branding.jpeg
Handle Branding
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Handle Branding company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Handle Branding company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to graphics company.

In the current year, Handle Branding company and graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Handle Branding company nor graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Handle Branding company nor graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Handle Branding company nor graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither graphics company nor Handle Branding company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither graphics nor Handle Branding holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither graphics company nor Handle Branding company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

graphics company employs more people globally than Handle Branding company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither graphics nor Handle Branding holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither graphics nor Handle Branding holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither graphics nor Handle Branding holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither graphics nor Handle Branding holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither graphics nor Handle Branding holds HIPAA certification.

Neither graphics nor Handle Branding holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X