Comparison Overview

Graphic Umbrella Company

VS

Image Transfers

Graphic Umbrella Company

1598 NE 1st Ave, Miami, FL, 33132, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.graphicumbrella.com

The Graphic Umbrella Company works with clients to create all the graphic communications products and services necessary to support their marketing and business communications needs. Our team is headquartered under one roof. From concept creation to an on-site printing facility, clients save time and money, by making Graphic Umbrella the one-stop for printed materials, plus creative and web services. With decades of experience, Graphic Umbrella is able to offer you value-added support - such as money saving ideas, product knowledge and expertise with the communications process. Most of our clients are small to mid-sized companies requiring more personalized attention, and that’s just what you’ll get, professional, customer service support, cost-effective total project solutions, and a working knowledge of the industry.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Image Transfers

55 Ramapo road, Garnersville, NY, 10923, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
https://imagetransfers.com

Image Transfers are custom dry rub-on transfer specialists. All we do is custom rub down transfers for graphic designers, artists and model-makers. A dry transfer (or rub-down) is an image printed on a translucent sheet. The image has a coating of adhesive on its back. The image is transferred from the translucent sheet onto another surface by applying light pressure in a rubbing motion. The dry transfer can be applied to most surfaces that are free of dust, grease or oil. Dry transfers are referred to as DRY because they are applied dry, without the use of water or solvent. A dry transfer is not a label or a water decal. After applying, the transferred image appears as if it was printed directly to the item. Our dry transfers are opaque because we back the colors with white. Therefore our rub-ons can be applied to a surface of any color without changing the color of the rub-on transfer. Our production artists can match all Pantone Matching System (PMS) colors including Metallic. Standard transfers are semi-gloss but we also offer matte/uncoated finishes. We consider dry transfers a semi-permanent application. We deliver within as little as 24 hours.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphic-umbrella-company.jpeg
Graphic Umbrella Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/image-transfers.jpeg
Image Transfers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Graphic Umbrella Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Image Transfers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graphic Umbrella Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Image Transfers in 2025.

Incident History — Graphic Umbrella Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graphic Umbrella Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Image Transfers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Image Transfers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphic-umbrella-company.jpeg
Graphic Umbrella Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/image-transfers.jpeg
Image Transfers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Image Transfers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Graphic Umbrella Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Image Transfers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Graphic Umbrella Company company.

In the current year, Image Transfers company and Graphic Umbrella Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Image Transfers company nor Graphic Umbrella Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Image Transfers company nor Graphic Umbrella Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Image Transfers company nor Graphic Umbrella Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Graphic Umbrella Company company nor Image Transfers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Graphic Umbrella Company nor Image Transfers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Graphic Umbrella Company company nor Image Transfers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Image Transfers company employs more people globally than Graphic Umbrella Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Graphic Umbrella Company nor Image Transfers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Graphic Umbrella Company nor Image Transfers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Graphic Umbrella Company nor Image Transfers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Graphic Umbrella Company nor Image Transfers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Graphic Umbrella Company nor Image Transfers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Graphic Umbrella Company nor Image Transfers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References