Comparison Overview

Graphic Specialties, Inc.

VS

JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division

Graphic Specialties, Inc.

2350 Breton Industrial Park Dr. S.E., Kentwood, MI, 49508, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

For the last 35 years, Graphic Specialties, Inc. has served customers with state-of-the-art equipment and an experienced, knowledgeable staff. We are dedicated to providing customers with a single, efficient, cost-effective source for multiple graphic arts finishing services. Graphic Specialties, Inc. takes the responsibility of guiding your project from pre-planning, through production to shipping. Nothing matters more to us than your satisfaction. To better serve our customers we have opened a second facility in Livonia, Michigan. With finishing capacity in both plants we are confident we can assist you with all of your finishing/bindery needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division

410 LAWRENCE BELL DR, Buffalo, New York, 14221, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Since 1981, JH Bertrand has been focused on making booklet label and related constructions that expand copy real estate on products. Our family of booklet label products include: Stitched and glue bound booklet labels, booklet labels for curved surfaces, extended content labels, foldout labels, mapfold booklet labels, encapsulated booklets on rolls, two and three ply labels, wrap around labels, paper, elastic and plastic neck hangers, coupon constructions, booklets with adhesive strips and patterned resealable adhesives. We use a variety of manufacturing methods including offset and marry, plowfold, re-registration of webs, pattern glue, zone coating, randomized variable coding, off press-on press combination processes and multi pass technologies. We have a dedicated clinical label division called Bertrand Clinical Label.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphic-specialties.jpeg
Graphic Specialties, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jh-bertrand-inc.jpeg
JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Graphic Specialties, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graphic Specialties, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division in 2025.

Incident History — Graphic Specialties, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graphic Specialties, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphic-specialties.jpeg
Graphic Specialties, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jh-bertrand-inc.jpeg
JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Graphic Specialties, Inc. company and JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Graphic Specialties, Inc. company.

In the current year, JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division company and Graphic Specialties, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division company nor Graphic Specialties, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division company nor Graphic Specialties, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division company nor Graphic Specialties, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Graphic Specialties, Inc. company nor JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Graphic Specialties, Inc. nor JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Graphic Specialties, Inc. company nor JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division company employs more people globally than Graphic Specialties, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Graphic Specialties, Inc. nor JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Graphic Specialties, Inc. nor JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Graphic Specialties, Inc. nor JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Graphic Specialties, Inc. nor JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Graphic Specialties, Inc. nor JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Graphic Specialties, Inc. nor JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N