Comparison Overview

Graphic Management Partners

VS

DIECUTSTICKERS.COM

Graphic Management Partners

47 Purdy Ave, Port Chester, New York, 10573, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Since 1986 Graphic Management Partners (GMP) has prided itself on being a leading commercial offset and digital printer in the tri-state area. GMP’s goal continues to be one that provides quality print options with competitive price rates all supported by personal customer service. Our team understands how important your company message is – we take it as our own! Facilitating that message through digital and offset print channels is what we do best. We provide a wide range of offerings like web-based ordering, prepress editing, digital print, offset print, large format, mailing, specialty kitting and fulfillment – all completed with quality measures, timeliness and budget management. Please contact us to see why we believe in “The Power of Print”. General Contact: [email protected] Website: http://www.gmprt.com Industry: Commercial Printing Company Size: 85 Headquarters: Port Chester, New York Type: LLC Founded: 1986 Specialties: Brochures, Books, Catalogs, Custom Binding, Direct Mail, Large Format, POS, Posters, Prepress, Print Management,

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DIECUTSTICKERS.COM

345 Andover Park East, Tukwila, 98188, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Since 2002, Diecutstickers.com has pushed the limits of vinyl sticker manufacturing with a commitment to quality and a focus on durability. With over 8,000 clients around the world, we live and work by the idea that humans, not robots keep business thriving. Whether you order 1 decal or 3,500 full color stickers, we strive to treat all of our clients like family.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphic-management-partners-llc..jpeg
Graphic Management Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diecutstickers-com.jpeg
DIECUTSTICKERS.COM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Graphic Management Partners
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DIECUTSTICKERS.COM
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graphic Management Partners in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DIECUTSTICKERS.COM in 2025.

Incident History — Graphic Management Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graphic Management Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DIECUTSTICKERS.COM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DIECUTSTICKERS.COM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphic-management-partners-llc..jpeg
Graphic Management Partners
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diecutstickers-com.jpeg
DIECUTSTICKERS.COM
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Graphic Management Partners company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DIECUTSTICKERS.COM company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DIECUTSTICKERS.COM company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Graphic Management Partners company.

In the current year, DIECUTSTICKERS.COM company and Graphic Management Partners company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DIECUTSTICKERS.COM company nor Graphic Management Partners company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DIECUTSTICKERS.COM company nor Graphic Management Partners company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DIECUTSTICKERS.COM company nor Graphic Management Partners company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Graphic Management Partners company nor DIECUTSTICKERS.COM company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Graphic Management Partners nor DIECUTSTICKERS.COM holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Graphic Management Partners company nor DIECUTSTICKERS.COM company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Graphic Management Partners company employs more people globally than DIECUTSTICKERS.COM company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Graphic Management Partners nor DIECUTSTICKERS.COM holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Graphic Management Partners nor DIECUTSTICKERS.COM holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Graphic Management Partners nor DIECUTSTICKERS.COM holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Graphic Management Partners nor DIECUTSTICKERS.COM holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Graphic Management Partners nor DIECUTSTICKERS.COM holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Graphic Management Partners nor DIECUTSTICKERS.COM holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N