Comparison Overview

Graphic Impressions

VS

Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc.

Graphic Impressions

1101 N Halstead St., Hutchinson, 67501, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18

Graphic Impressions makes commercial graphics done your way. It provides customized products and services that are flexible, on time, and on budget. We’re here to help you succeed. Graphic Impressions is a nationally known digital and screen printing company. We specialize in Vehicle Graphics, Signage and Point of Purchase products. We also provide: - Installation for new graphics - Graphics removal - Art Design and Planning Services We use 3M materials and appropriate inks to maximize the life and impact of our high quality images. You know your customers want or need products of this caliber, and that many of your existing customers are buying these items already. Why send them to someone else? We can help you make them available through your company. We are looking for business relationships across the country with commercial printers. We want to build trade print relationships with printers so that we can offer trade pricing and account protection. From our location in Hutchinson, KS, we can ship and install anywhere in the country. For questions on how to start this relationship, please call Jeff or Ryan Westfall at (800) 237-2171.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc.

200 W 11th St, Lockport, Illinois, 60441, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

We have built our business as a full-service, single-source supplier of commercial printing, business forms & checks, stationery & business cards, labels, promotional products, membership & ID cards and computer supplies. Our clients know that they can count on us to do what ever is necessary to satisfy their requirements. It's easy to deliver an "off the shelf product" the next morning or even the same day. If need be, we can print and ship your four-color job the same day! We strive to make sure our customers are saving money annually, spending less time and energy doing the legwork of analyzing the markets to know whether they are getting the best bang for your buck. By utlizing us as your "vendor of choice" for many of our products/services it allows for a long-term value added and incentive oriented business program.that eventually consolidates your amount of current vendors, streamlines the procurement process and provides solutions and success! When you need a job done right and on time, you can count on Automated Forms & Graphics, Inc

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphic-impressions.jpeg
Graphic Impressions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/automated-forms-and-graphics-inc..jpeg
Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Graphic Impressions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graphic Impressions in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Graphic Impressions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graphic Impressions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphic-impressions.jpeg
Graphic Impressions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/automated-forms-and-graphics-inc..jpeg
Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Graphic Impressions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Graphic Impressions company.

In the current year, Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. company and Graphic Impressions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. company nor Graphic Impressions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. company nor Graphic Impressions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. company nor Graphic Impressions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Graphic Impressions company nor Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Graphic Impressions nor Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Graphic Impressions company.

Graphic Impressions company employs more people globally than Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Graphic Impressions nor Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Graphic Impressions nor Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Graphic Impressions nor Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Graphic Impressions nor Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Graphic Impressions nor Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Graphic Impressions nor Automated Forms and Graphics, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L