Comparison Overview

Graphic Arts Group

VS

Rosemont Press, Inc.

Graphic Arts Group

Welcome House, Coventry, West Midlands, CV4 8AU, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.graphicartsgroup.co.uk/

Graphic Arts Group – When you need a fast response! Our Promotional Merchandise division provides a carefully selected range of branded merchandise to industry, charity, and public sector organisations, taking ideas from concept to reality #BrandedMerchandise #PromotionalMerchandise Our Industrial Labelling division produces all types of labels, nameplates, and tags for organisations ranging from the MoD to niche manufacturers #BrandAwarness #PromoteYourBrand And last but not least, our Corporate Print division harnesses our extensive in-house printing capability to deliver all types of printed materials from folders to brochures. #CorporateBranding #CorporateMerchandise We’d love to work with you too! APPROVED SUPPLIERS TO: public sector (NHS, MOD, Local Government), ESPO, and brands such as Tui, Jaguar Land Rover and Google. Please call us on 024 7667 3415 or email us at [email protected]

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Rosemont Press, Inc.

35 West Jefryn Blvd., Deer Park, 11729, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799
http://rosemontinc.com

From our beginning as a New York City commercial printing company founded by brothers John and Charles Reardon in 1962, Rosemont has always been known to deliver when no one else can -- producing great work under impossible deadlines, inventing fulfillment systems to meet unique client requirements, and staying on point with new services to handle multiple needs all under one roof for a more efficient and cost-effective experience. Still run by the Reardon family in the New York metro area six decades later, Rosemont has built on its solid printing foundation and evolved into a premier provider of end to end solutions for marketing communications and special events. We are implementation experts. We provide approaches for every angle and answers to questions you haven’t even thought of yet. You can confidently put yourself in our hands, and let us successfully execute your programs so you can focus on your business.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphic-arts-coventry-ltd.jpeg
Graphic Arts Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rosemont-press-inc.jpeg
Rosemont Press, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Graphic Arts Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rosemont Press, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graphic Arts Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rosemont Press, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Graphic Arts Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graphic Arts Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rosemont Press, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rosemont Press, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphic-arts-coventry-ltd.jpeg
Graphic Arts Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rosemont-press-inc.jpeg
Rosemont Press, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rosemont Press, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Graphic Arts Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rosemont Press, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Graphic Arts Group company.

In the current year, Rosemont Press, Inc. company and Graphic Arts Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rosemont Press, Inc. company nor Graphic Arts Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rosemont Press, Inc. company nor Graphic Arts Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rosemont Press, Inc. company nor Graphic Arts Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Graphic Arts Group company nor Rosemont Press, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Graphic Arts Group nor Rosemont Press, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Graphic Arts Group company nor Rosemont Press, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Graphic Arts Group company employs more people globally than Rosemont Press, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Graphic Arts Group nor Rosemont Press, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Graphic Arts Group nor Rosemont Press, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Graphic Arts Group nor Rosemont Press, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Graphic Arts Group nor Rosemont Press, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Graphic Arts Group nor Rosemont Press, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Graphic Arts Group nor Rosemont Press, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References