Comparison Overview

Granzow, Inc.

VS

NewcoUSA Industrial Services

Granzow, Inc.

undefined, Charlotte, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Granzow® provides high quality industrial products with outstanding reliability for a host of different applications. Our products are built to the highest standards to exceed the expectations of our customers. Providing quick and accurate service is our goal. We are available to answer your questions regarding installation, operation, maintenance, and troubleshooting. Please contact us for personalized assistance.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NewcoUSA Industrial Services

87 Howell Ave, Fairburn, Georgia, US, 30213
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

NewcoUSA is dedicated to delivering exceptional results while upholding the highest standards of integrity and excellence. Every action reflects a commitment to exceeding expectations, ensuring customers experience unmatched quality and pride in every interaction. Guided by the principle that "whatever our hands find to do, we do well," the focus remains on providing solutions that inspire confidence and foster success. Decisions are grounded in facts, and every effort is made to create value that resonates with customers and communities alike. Faith-based initiatives extend this commitment beyond business, dedicating a portion of profits to local and international ministries, working to uplift those in need and make a positive impact globally.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/granzow-inc-.jpeg
Granzow, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newco-industrial-services.jpeg
NewcoUSA Industrial Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Granzow, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NewcoUSA Industrial Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Granzow, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NewcoUSA Industrial Services in 2025.

Incident History — Granzow, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Granzow, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NewcoUSA Industrial Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NewcoUSA Industrial Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/granzow-inc-.jpeg
Granzow, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newco-industrial-services.jpeg
NewcoUSA Industrial Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Granzow, Inc. company and NewcoUSA Industrial Services company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, NewcoUSA Industrial Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Granzow, Inc. company.

In the current year, NewcoUSA Industrial Services company and Granzow, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NewcoUSA Industrial Services company nor Granzow, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NewcoUSA Industrial Services company nor Granzow, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NewcoUSA Industrial Services company nor Granzow, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Granzow, Inc. company nor NewcoUSA Industrial Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Granzow, Inc. nor NewcoUSA Industrial Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NewcoUSA Industrial Services company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Granzow, Inc. company.

NewcoUSA Industrial Services company employs more people globally than Granzow, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Granzow, Inc. nor NewcoUSA Industrial Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Granzow, Inc. nor NewcoUSA Industrial Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Granzow, Inc. nor NewcoUSA Industrial Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Granzow, Inc. nor NewcoUSA Industrial Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Granzow, Inc. nor NewcoUSA Industrial Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Granzow, Inc. nor NewcoUSA Industrial Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H