Comparison Overview

Granta Publications

VS

iMediaworld

Granta Publications

12 Addison Avenue, London, W11 4QR, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 800 and 849

Granta Publications is the home of Granta Magazine, Granta Books and Portobello Books. The magazine was originally founded by students at the university of Cambridge in 1889. It was relaunched in 1979, followed ten years later by Granta Books. In 2005, the imprint Portobello Books was added to focus on translation and nonfiction. Granta Publications is based in London, United Kingdom.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 99
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

iMediaworld

Alliston, L9R1L7, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

From publications to digital signage and everything in-between, we have the experience, expertise and resources to ensure your project is completed on time and on budget. You, the client, simply need to bring your idea to iMediaworld, and we’ll make it a reality as we are able to accomplish all of your goals from design concept to printing.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/granta-publications.jpeg
Granta Publications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imediaworld.jpeg
iMediaworld
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Granta Publications
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
iMediaworld
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Granta Publications in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for iMediaworld in 2025.

Incident History — Granta Publications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Granta Publications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — iMediaworld (X = Date, Y = Severity)

iMediaworld cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/granta-publications.jpeg
Granta Publications
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imediaworld.jpeg
iMediaworld
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Granta Publications company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to iMediaworld company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, iMediaworld company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Granta Publications company.

In the current year, iMediaworld company and Granta Publications company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither iMediaworld company nor Granta Publications company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither iMediaworld company nor Granta Publications company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither iMediaworld company nor Granta Publications company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Granta Publications company nor iMediaworld company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Granta Publications nor iMediaworld holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Granta Publications company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to iMediaworld company.

Granta Publications company employs more people globally than iMediaworld company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Granta Publications nor iMediaworld holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Granta Publications nor iMediaworld holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Granta Publications nor iMediaworld holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Granta Publications nor iMediaworld holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Granta Publications nor iMediaworld holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Granta Publications nor iMediaworld holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.