Comparison Overview

Granger Construction

VS

KOLIN Construction

Granger Construction

6267 Aurelius Rd, Lansing, Michigan, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Since its founding as a family-owned company in 1959, Granger Construction has fostered an atmosphere of integrity, inclusiveness and ingenuity. Granger has been ranked among the top workplaces in Michigan, and places the utmost value on relationships and community. By applying the Golden Rule in our interactions with clients and employees, Granger’s workplace culture – whether in the office or on the jobsite – advances and strengthens our most valuable asset – our people. At Granger Construction, we strive to truly understand our customers’ vision and aspirations. We listen intently, collaborate closely, and consistently build results that make a positive impact on the communities they serve. Our experience across multiple market segments – from healthcare and industrial to education and government – brings to our customers a deep and broad range of expertise. This informed approach together with our guidance makes a significant difference in the ultimate success of any building endeavor.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 317
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KOLIN Construction

Horasan str. No: 14 G.O.P. Çankaya, Ankara, TR
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

Kolin, Türkiye'de ve üç kıtada gerçekleştirdiği dev projeler, inşaat ve enerji başta olmak üzere farklı sektörlerde yıllık 1,5 milyar dolar ciroyu yakalayan başarı grafiğiyle dünya inşaat liginin küresel bir oyuncusudur. Her yıl dünyanın en büyük müteahhitlik şirketlerinin sıralandığı ENR listesine adını yazdıran Kolin’in başarı albümünde büyük altyapı yatırımları, İstanbul Havalimanı gibi mega projeler, yollar, raylı sistemler, enerji santralleri, barajlar, limanlar, askeri tesisler ile elçilik, hastane, otel, yurt, ve okul gibi özel kullanım amaçlı binalar yer alıyor. Libya’dan Azerbaycan ve Uganda’ya kadar uzanan geniş bir coğrafyada büyük ulaşım ve yatırım projeleri gerçekleştiren Kolin İnşaat’ın Azerbaycan, Libya, Polonya, Romanya, Umman, Suudi Arabistan Krallığı ve Kuveyt’te yurtdışı ofisleri bulunuyor. Kolin İnşaat, Türkiye’nin kalkınma yolculuğunda dönüm noktası olan projelere imza atmanın, yurt dışında bayrağımızı dalgalandırmanın ve 44 yıldır kazandıklarını bu topraklara yatırmanın gururuyla yoluna devam ediyor. _________________________________________________ Kolin is a global player in the world construction league with theits huge projects realized in Turkey and on three different continents, and its. The annual turnover of reaches 1.5 billion dollars in different sectors, especially in construction and energy. Kolin's success album,name which makes its is marked on the ENR list which accumulates the world's largest contracting companies year after year. Kolin’s album of success, which lists the world's largest contracting companies every year, includes major infrastructure investments, mega projects such as Istanbul Airport, roads, rail systems, power plants, dams, ports, military facilities, embassies, hospitals, hotels, dormitories, and private buildings such as schools. Kolin Construction, which realizes large transportation and investment projects in a wide geography varying from Libya to Azerbaijan and Uganda, has established offices abroad in Azerbaijan, Libya, Poland, Romania, Oman, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Kolin continues on its way with the pride of signing projects that are milestones in Turkey's and World’s development journey, flying our flag abroad, and investing what it has earned for Kolin is proud to grow by performing all these projects in the 44 years of its establishment in these lands.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/granger-construction.jpeg
Granger Construction
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kolin-construction-tourism-industry-and-trading-co-inc.jpeg
KOLIN Construction
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Granger Construction
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KOLIN Construction
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Granger Construction in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KOLIN Construction in 2025.

Incident History — Granger Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Granger Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KOLIN Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KOLIN Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/granger-construction.jpeg
Granger Construction
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kolin-construction-tourism-industry-and-trading-co-inc.jpeg
KOLIN Construction
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

KOLIN Construction company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Granger Construction company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, KOLIN Construction company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Granger Construction company.

In the current year, KOLIN Construction company and Granger Construction company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KOLIN Construction company nor Granger Construction company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KOLIN Construction company nor Granger Construction company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KOLIN Construction company nor Granger Construction company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Granger Construction company nor KOLIN Construction company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Granger Construction nor KOLIN Construction holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Granger Construction company nor KOLIN Construction company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Granger Construction company employs more people globally than KOLIN Construction company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither Granger Construction nor KOLIN Construction holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Granger Construction nor KOLIN Construction holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Granger Construction nor KOLIN Construction holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Granger Construction nor KOLIN Construction holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Granger Construction nor KOLIN Construction holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Granger Construction nor KOLIN Construction holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Deck Mate 1 executes firmware directly from an external EEPROM without verifying authenticity or integrity. An attacker with physical access can replace or reflash the EEPROM to run arbitrary code that persists across reboots. Because this design predates modern secure-boot or signed-update mechanisms, affected systems should be physically protected or retired from service. The vendor has not indicated that firmware updates are available for this legacy model.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Deck Mate 2 lacks a verified secure-boot chain and runtime integrity validation for its controller and display modules. Without cryptographic boot verification, an attacker with physical access can modify or replace the bootloader, kernel, or filesystem and gain persistent code execution on reboot. This weakness allows long-term firmware tampering that survives power cycles. The vendor indicates that more recent firmware updates strengthen update-chain integrity and disable physical update ports to mitigate related attack avenues.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Deck Mate 2's firmware update mechanism accepts packages without cryptographic signature verification, encrypts them with a single hard-coded AES key shared across devices, and uses a truncated HMAC for integrity validation. Attackers with access to the update interface - typically via the unit's USB update port - can craft or modify firmware packages to execute arbitrary code as root, allowing persistent compromise of the device's integrity and deck randomization process. Physical or on-premises access remains the most likely attack path, though network-exposed or telemetry-enabled deployments could theoretically allow remote exploitation if misconfigured. The vendor confirmed that firmware updates have been issued to correct these update-chain weaknesses and that USB update access has been disabled on affected units.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS bc-fips on All (API modules), Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java LTS bcprov-lts8on on All (API modules) allows Excessive Allocation. This vulnerability is associated with program files core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeCFB.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeGCM.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/SHA256NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeEngine.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeCBC.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeCTR.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCFB.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeGCM.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeEngine.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCBC.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeGCMSIV.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCCM.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCTR.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA256NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA224NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA3NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHAKENativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA512NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA384NativeDigest.Java. This issue affects Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS: from 2.1.0 through 2.1.1; Bouncy Castle for Java LTS: from 2.73.0 through 2.73.7.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:P/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Wasmtime is a runtime for WebAssembly. In versions from 38.0.0 to before 38.0.3, the implementation of component-model related host-to-wasm trampolines in Wasmtime contained a bug where it's possible to carefully craft a component, which when called in a specific way, would crash the host with a segfault or assert failure. Wasmtime 38.0.3 has been released and is patched to fix this issue. There are no workarounds.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X