Comparison Overview

Grandview Products Inc.

VS

Mayfair Casino Ltd

Grandview Products Inc.

3061 NW 24th St, Miami, Florida, 33142, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Grandview Products has been rebuilding and distributing Pre-Owned Casino Products since 1992. Our state of the art facility located in Miami Florida was designed to consistently deliver the highest standards of reconditioning and technical support available. In addition, maintaining an inventory of over one thousand machines, with new shipments arriving weekly, guarantees that Grandview can fulfill the most demanding needs on the newest equipment being retired from Casinos worldwide.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mayfair Casino Ltd

20 North Audley Street, London, W1K 6LX, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Mayfair Casino Ltd is one of the newest operators of land-based casinos in London. Bringing flair and dynamism to London’s gambling scene, its portfolio includes such famous establishments as Horizons – Leicester Square’s longest serving casino – and Mayfair’s iconic Clermont Club, one of the first casinos to open in the UK. With an aristocratic history and a history of gaming dating back to 1962, located in a stunning townhouse originally built in 1740, the newly refurbished Clermont Club will mix classic architecture and modern luxury with opulence and refinement.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grand-view-products-inc..jpeg
Grandview Products Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mayfair-casino-limited.jpeg
Mayfair Casino Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Grandview Products Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mayfair Casino Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grandview Products Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mayfair Casino Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Grandview Products Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grandview Products Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mayfair Casino Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mayfair Casino Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grand-view-products-inc..jpeg
Grandview Products Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mayfair-casino-limited.jpeg
Mayfair Casino Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mayfair Casino Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Grandview Products Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mayfair Casino Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Grandview Products Inc. company.

In the current year, Mayfair Casino Ltd company and Grandview Products Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mayfair Casino Ltd company nor Grandview Products Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mayfair Casino Ltd company nor Grandview Products Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mayfair Casino Ltd company nor Grandview Products Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Grandview Products Inc. company nor Mayfair Casino Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Grandview Products Inc. nor Mayfair Casino Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Grandview Products Inc. company nor Mayfair Casino Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mayfair Casino Ltd company employs more people globally than Grandview Products Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Grandview Products Inc. nor Mayfair Casino Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Grandview Products Inc. nor Mayfair Casino Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Grandview Products Inc. nor Mayfair Casino Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Grandview Products Inc. nor Mayfair Casino Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Grandview Products Inc. nor Mayfair Casino Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Grandview Products Inc. nor Mayfair Casino Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H