Comparison Overview

Grammer AG

VS

Stellantis

Grammer AG

Grammer Allee 2 Ursensollen, Bayern 92289, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.grammer.com

Company profile GRAMMER AG, which has its head office in Ursensollen, specializes in the development and production of complex components and systems for automotive interiors as well as suspension driver and passenger seats for onroad and offroad vehicles. In the Automotive product area, the Company supplies headrests, armrests, center console systems, high-quality interior components and operating systems, and innovative thermoplastic components for the automotive industry to prominent car manufacturers and Tier 1 suppliers in the vehicle industry. The Commercial Vehicles product area comprises the business segments of truck and offroad seats (tractors, construction machinery, and forklifts) and train and bus seats. GRAMMER has about 14,200 employees and operates in 19 countries around the world. GRAMMER shares are listed in the Prime Standard and traded on the Munich and Frankfurt stock exchanges via the Xetra electronic trading platform.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Stellantis

Amsterdam, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 600 and 649
https://www.stellantis.com

Our storied and iconic brands embody the passion of their visionary founders and today’s customers in their innovative products and services: they include Abarth, Alfa Romeo, Chrysler, Citroën, Dodge, DS Automobiles, Fiat, Jeep®, Lancia, Maserati, Opel, Peugeot, Ram, Vauxhall and mobility brands Free2move and Leasys. Powered by our diversity, we lead the way the world moves – aspiring to become the greatest sustainable mobility tech company, not the biggest, while creating added value for all stakeholders as well as the communities in which we operate.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 96,409
Subsidiaries: 30
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grammer-ag.jpeg
Grammer AG
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stellantis.jpeg
Stellantis
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Grammer AG
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stellantis
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grammer AG in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Stellantis has 400.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Grammer AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grammer AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stellantis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stellantis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grammer-ag.jpeg
Grammer AG
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stellantis.jpeg
Stellantis
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: OAuth Token Exploitation, Third-Party Integration (Salesloft's Drift AI chat tool), Salesforce Environment Pivoting
Motivation: Data Theft for Extortion, Phishing Campaign Enablement, Dark Web Data Monetization
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Third-Party Service Provider, Stolen OAuth Tokens, Salesforce Integration Exploitation
Motivation: Data Theft, Extortion, Phishing Enablement
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Likely financial gain (data exploitation for scams/phishing)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Grammer AG company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stellantis company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Stellantis company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Grammer AG company has not reported any.

In the current year, Stellantis company has reported more cyber incidents than Grammer AG company.

Neither Stellantis company nor Grammer AG company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Stellantis company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Grammer AG company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Stellantis company nor Grammer AG company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Grammer AG company nor Stellantis company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Grammer AG nor Stellantis holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Stellantis company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Grammer AG company.

Stellantis company employs more people globally than Grammer AG company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Grammer AG nor Stellantis holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Grammer AG nor Stellantis holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Grammer AG nor Stellantis holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Grammer AG nor Stellantis holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Grammer AG nor Stellantis holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Grammer AG nor Stellantis holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References