Comparison Overview

Grainger Legal

VS

Legum Consultants

Grainger Legal

1/40 Forest Street, Castlemaine, Victoria, 3450, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Grainger Legal is a personal injury law firm that prides itself on providing the highest level of professional service and accessibility with an approachable team where you can speak directly to a lawyer. We are locally owned and operated with offices in Bacchus Marsh and Castlemaine and are active supporting members of our local communities. Grainger Legal is an energetic and dedicated firm, our business is built on integrity and excellence. We have a commitment to the establishment of enduring relationships with our clients.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Legum Consultants

New Delhi, 110096, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Legum Consultants is a Law Firm which provides legal services and conduct cases across the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High court, NCDRC, SCDRC, NGT, AFT, CAT, NCLAT, TMC and all other Commissions and Tribunals as well as all other subordinate courts of Delhi. ACCIDENTAL CLAIM ARMY CASES CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CORPORATE & COMMERCIAL LAW CIVIL LITIGATIONS CRIMINAL LITIGATIONS EMPLOYMENT & LABOUR LAW ENVIRONMENTAL LAW FAMILY DISPUTE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION REAL ESTATE SERVICE MATTERS

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legum-consultants.jpeg
Legum Consultants
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Grainger Legal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Legum Consultants
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grainger Legal in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legum Consultants in 2025.

Incident History — Grainger Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grainger Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Legum Consultants (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legum Consultants cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grainger-legal.jpeg
Grainger Legal
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legum-consultants.jpeg
Legum Consultants
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Grainger Legal company and Legum Consultants company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Legum Consultants company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Grainger Legal company.

In the current year, Legum Consultants company and Grainger Legal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Legum Consultants company nor Grainger Legal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Legum Consultants company nor Grainger Legal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Legum Consultants company nor Grainger Legal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Grainger Legal company nor Legum Consultants company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Grainger Legal nor Legum Consultants holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Grainger Legal company nor Legum Consultants company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Legum Consultants company employs more people globally than Grainger Legal company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Grainger Legal nor Legum Consultants holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Grainger Legal nor Legum Consultants holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Grainger Legal nor Legum Consultants holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Grainger Legal nor Legum Consultants holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Grainger Legal nor Legum Consultants holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Grainger Legal nor Legum Consultants holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X