Comparison Overview

Graffic Traffic Company

VS

HGA Print & Design

Graffic Traffic Company

2275 Mcknight Rd. Suite 2, North St. Paul, Minnesota, 55109, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.graffictraffic.com

Graffic Traffic Celebrated its 31st year in business in 2022. We are a family-owned business located in North St. Paul, MN. We specialize helping our clients "put their brand in motion" with great promotional products and decorated garments. We also support them with in-house graphic design. Graffic Traffic works with all types of organizations, schools, churches, businesses, & special events.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

HGA Print & Design

15 Greenway Business Centre, Harlow, Essex, CM19 5QE, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hgaprint-design.co.uk/

It all started 30 years ago combined, Stuart and Bruce started their journey in advertising, where they bring their knowledge, expertise and created HGA. A client focused, full service printing company that offers complete solutions for all your print requirements. We are in Harlow, Essex. To ensure that every single project runs smoothly from start to finish, we offer complete project management, from creating an idea to making it come alive and distributing. Our clients range from large global brands, blue chip companies and small family run businesses. Whatever your size, scope and budget, we treat all our clients the same way: with dedication, professionalism and commitment. Always coming up with the right solution, always striving for excellence in every aspect of the printing process, today and tomorrow. That’s the HGA promise. That’s the HGA difference.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graffic-traffic-llc.jpeg
Graffic Traffic Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hga-print-design.jpeg
HGA Print & Design
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Graffic Traffic Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HGA Print & Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graffic Traffic Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HGA Print & Design in 2025.

Incident History — Graffic Traffic Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graffic Traffic Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HGA Print & Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HGA Print & Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graffic-traffic-llc.jpeg
Graffic Traffic Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hga-print-design.jpeg
HGA Print & Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

HGA Print & Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Graffic Traffic Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, HGA Print & Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Graffic Traffic Company company.

In the current year, HGA Print & Design company and Graffic Traffic Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither HGA Print & Design company nor Graffic Traffic Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither HGA Print & Design company nor Graffic Traffic Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither HGA Print & Design company nor Graffic Traffic Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Graffic Traffic Company company nor HGA Print & Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Graffic Traffic Company nor HGA Print & Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Graffic Traffic Company company nor HGA Print & Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Graffic Traffic Company company employs more people globally than HGA Print & Design company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Graffic Traffic Company nor HGA Print & Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Graffic Traffic Company nor HGA Print & Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Graffic Traffic Company nor HGA Print & Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Graffic Traffic Company nor HGA Print & Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Graffic Traffic Company nor HGA Print & Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Graffic Traffic Company nor HGA Print & Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References