Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Grafana LabsGrafana Labs
VS
SnowflakeSnowflake
Grafana Labs

Grafana Labs

29 Broadway, Penthouse, New York, NY, US, 10006

Last Update: 19/05/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://grafana.com
601/1000Poor

Grafana Labs, the company behind the open observability cloud, is founded on the principles of open source, open standards, open ecosystems, and open culture. Grafana Cloud, our fully managed observability platform, is flexible and built for scale, enabling organization...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:1,772
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2
Snowflake

Snowflake

Menlo Park, CA, US, 94563

Last Update: 14/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.snowflake.com
100/1000Critical

Snowflake delivers the AI Data Cloud — a global network where thousands of organizations mobilize data with near-unlimited scale, concurrency, and performance. Inside the AI Data Cloud, organizations unite their siloed data, easily discover and securely share governed d...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:10,807
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
7
Known data breaches
17
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Grafana Labs

Grafana Labs

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Snowflake

Snowflake

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Grafana Labs has 88.68% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Snowflake has 560.38% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Grafana Labs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grafana Labs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Snowflake (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Snowflake cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Grafana Labs

Grafana Labs

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GRA1779006227
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GRA1775573897
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GRA2792027112125
Snowflake

Snowflake

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEN1779855877
🔒 Incident : Breach
ROCANOSNO1776126436
🔒 Incident : Breach
ANO1775660105

FAQ

Between Grafana Labs company and Snowflake company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Grafana Labs company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Grafana Labs company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Grafana Labs company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Grafana Labs company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Grafana Labs company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Grafana Labs company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Grafana Labs company and Snowflake company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Grafana Labs company and Snowflake company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Grafana Labs company and Snowflake company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Grafana Labs company and Snowflake company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Grafana Labs and Snowflake, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Grafana Labs and Snowflake, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Grafana Labs or Snowflake ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Grafana Labs or Snowflake ?
Between Grafana Labs and Snowflake, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Grafana Labs and Snowflake, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA