Comparison Overview

Grab

VS

ByteDance

Grab

3 Media Close, Grab HQ #01-03/06 , Singapore, Singapore, SG, 138498
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://grab.careers

Grab is Southeast Asia’s leading superapp, offering a suite of services consisting of deliveries, mobility, financial services, enterprise and others. Grabbers come from all over the world, and we are united by a common mission: to drive Southeast Asia forward by creating economic empowerment for everyone. At Grab, every Grabber is guided by The Grab Way, which explains our mission and the operating principles on how we can achieve it together. We call these principles the 4Hs: Heart We work together as OneGrab to serve communities in Southeast Asia Hunger We work to understand ground truths and drive improvements, big and small Honour We keep our word and steward our resources wisely to build and sustain trust Humility We are a constant work-in-progress, and we never stop learning to get better

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 52,680
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

ByteDance

China, China, CN, 100098
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
https://job.bytedance.com/en/#/

ByteDance is a global incubator of platforms at the cutting edge of commerce, content, entertainment and enterprise services - over 2.5bn people interact with ByteDance products including TikTok. Creation is the core of ByteDance's purpose. Our products are built to help imaginations thrive. This is doubly true of the teams that make our innovations possible. Together, we inspire creativity and enrich life - a mission we aim towards achieving every day. At ByteDance, we create together and grow together. That's how we drive impact - for ourselves, our company, and the users we serve. We are committed to building a safe, healthy and positive online environment for all our users. We have over 110,000 employees based in more than 30 countries globally. Join us.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 45,557
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grabapp.jpeg
Grab
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bytedance.jpeg
ByteDance
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Grab
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ByteDance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grab in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

ByteDance has 72.41% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Grab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ByteDance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ByteDance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grabapp.jpeg
Grab
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bytedance.jpeg
ByteDance
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Regulatory Compliance
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Grab company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ByteDance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ByteDance company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Grab company has not reported any.

In the current year, ByteDance company has reported more cyber incidents than Grab company.

Neither ByteDance company nor Grab company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ByteDance company nor Grab company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

ByteDance company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Grab company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Grab company nor ByteDance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Grab nor ByteDance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Grab company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ByteDance company.

Grab company employs more people globally than ByteDance company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Grab nor ByteDance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Grab nor ByteDance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Grab nor ByteDance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Grab nor ByteDance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Grab nor ByteDance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Grab nor ByteDance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References