Comparison Overview

General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA)

VS

Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc.

General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA)

26 Mercy St, Bendigo, Victoria, AU, 3550
Last Update: 2025-11-26

GPSA serves as Australia’s primary organization for GP/RG supervisors and training practices, representing approximately 10,000 members. We support supervision in its various forms, prioritizing support for supervisors, practice managers, and training practices developing future general practitioners (GPs) and rural generalists (RGs). Through active engagement with our members, we advocate for enhanced training conditions, emphasizing sustainability and professional fulfillment as pivotal factors in providing best practice supervision and attracting more doctors to General Practice. GPSA is committed to fostering the enthusiasm that propels the GP training sector forward, offering service, support, research, innovation, education, and advocacy. Our vision is to champion a thriving GP training sector that is cohesive, duly acknowledged, rewarded, and respected as the cornerstone of Australia's healthcare system.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc.

2079 Yonge St, None, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M4S 2A4
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749

Sight Care Optometry and Optical offers comprehensive eye sight care for people of all ages. Our experienced Optometrists will expertly assess your needs and help you manage your eye sight for enhanced satisfaction. Our experienced Opticians and Eye Fashion Stylists will help you select glasses and contact lenses that not only maximize your vision, but help you look fashionable and at your best.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gpsupervisorsaustralia.jpeg
General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sight-care-optometry-and-optical-inc.jpeg
Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gpsupervisorsaustralia.jpeg
General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sight-care-optometry-and-optical-inc.jpeg
Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company has not reported any.

In the current year, Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. company and General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. company nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. company nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company nor Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) nor Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company nor Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company employs more people globally than Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) nor Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) nor Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) nor Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) nor Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) nor Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) nor Sight Care Optometry and Optical Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H