Comparison Overview

GPA

VS

Inditex

GPA

Avenida Brigadeiro Luís Antônio 3172, São Paulo, SP, BR, 01402000
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

We are one of the largest food retail companies in Brazil. We were pioneers with a multi-format and multi-channel business model that brings together renowned chains and brands such as Pão de Açúcar and Extra, Minuto Pão de Açúcar, Pão de Açúcar Fresh and Mini Extra. In addition to our own and exclusive brands Qualitá, Taeq and Club des Sommeliers. We have more than 765 physical stores and are leaders in food e-commerce in Brazil, working tirelessly to be the best choice for our customers and the pride of our team. We are driven by a passion to serve and win. Our people are committed to our values to offer the best shopping experience in our stores. In all areas, regardless of role or position, everyone is focused on serving and delighting our customers every day.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 25,179
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Inditex

Avda. de la Diputación s/n, Arteixo, A Coruña, ES, 15143
Last Update: 2025-11-27

What is Inditex? Inditex comprises seven brands: Zara, Pull&Bear, Massimo Dutti, Bershka, Stradivarius, Oysho and Zara Home. We sell in 213 markets through our online platforms and our over 5.800 stores. But… What is Inditex? We are the clothes you choose to wear, the products with which you decorate your home, or celebrate a special occasion. You choose us. We are decisive. We trust in the ability and instincts of our professional team. We have got to where we are today thanks to them and the hard work of those people who have shown us where we can improve. We reinvent ourselves, we correct our mistakes and we keep moving forward. We react. #morethanajob

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 50,436
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gpabr.jpeg
GPA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inditex.jpeg
Inditex
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GPA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Inditex
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GPA in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inditex in 2025.

Incident History — GPA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GPA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Inditex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inditex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gpabr.jpeg
GPA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inditex.jpeg
Inditex
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Inditex company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GPA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Inditex company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GPA company.

In the current year, Inditex company and GPA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Inditex company nor GPA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Inditex company nor GPA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Inditex company nor GPA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GPA company nor Inditex company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GPA nor Inditex holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Inditex company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GPA company.

Inditex company employs more people globally than GPA company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither GPA nor Inditex holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GPA nor Inditex holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GPA nor Inditex holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GPA nor Inditex holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GPA nor Inditex holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GPA nor Inditex holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H