Comparison Overview

GPA Engineering

VS

Thermaster Mechanical

GPA Engineering

121 Greenhill Road, Unley, South Australia, 5061, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

In operation since 1987 and with offices in Adelaide, Brisbane, Perth, Melbourne and Darwin, GPA provides professional engineering services to; • Oil & Gas – Field Development, Pipeline, Processing & Distribution • Mining / Minerals Processing • Water and Waste Water Treatment, Handling and Distribution • Power Generation, Distribution and Renewable • Defence In the key areas of; • Feasibility and Concept Engineering • Engineering Design: Mechanical, Electrical, Civil/Structural, Chemical/Process • SCADA and Control System Integration • Safety and Risk Engineering • Project and Construction Management

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 358
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Thermaster Mechanical

740 N Columbine Ave, Lombard, Illinois, 60148, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Thermaster Mechanical has been providing service on light to medium duty commercial equipment throughout the suburban Chicagoland area for 30+ years. Since it’s founding in 1986, Thermaster has always aimed to do thorough and quality work, and to go above and beyond to satisfy all of our customer’s needs so that they know they can trust us and are always covered when they have us as their service provider. We believed that through excellent service, we could provide excellent jobs that are rewarding and fulfilling to our technicians. Today we pride ourselves in providing exceptional service, tackling challenges with creative and effective but appropriate problem solving, striving for efficient and smart working practices, and always being enthusiastic to learn more.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gpa-engineering.jpeg
GPA Engineering
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thermaster-mechanical.jpeg
Thermaster Mechanical
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GPA Engineering
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Thermaster Mechanical
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GPA Engineering in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thermaster Mechanical in 2025.

Incident History — GPA Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GPA Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Thermaster Mechanical (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thermaster Mechanical cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gpa-engineering.jpeg
GPA Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thermaster-mechanical.jpeg
Thermaster Mechanical
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Thermaster Mechanical company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GPA Engineering company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Thermaster Mechanical company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GPA Engineering company.

In the current year, Thermaster Mechanical company and GPA Engineering company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Thermaster Mechanical company nor GPA Engineering company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Thermaster Mechanical company nor GPA Engineering company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Thermaster Mechanical company nor GPA Engineering company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GPA Engineering company nor Thermaster Mechanical company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GPA Engineering nor Thermaster Mechanical holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GPA Engineering company nor Thermaster Mechanical company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GPA Engineering company employs more people globally than Thermaster Mechanical company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither GPA Engineering nor Thermaster Mechanical holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GPA Engineering nor Thermaster Mechanical holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GPA Engineering nor Thermaster Mechanical holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GPA Engineering nor Thermaster Mechanical holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GPA Engineering nor Thermaster Mechanical holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GPA Engineering nor Thermaster Mechanical holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H