Comparison Overview

Global Partners Governance

VS

Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston

Global Partners Governance

6-8 Boundary Street, London, Tower Hamlets, E2 7JE, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Global Partners Governance is a social purpose company working to strengthen political institutions and improve the quality of political representation in countries around the world. We do this in two main ways. First, our staff and associates work directly with politicians, parliaments and ministries in various countries to help them and their institutions work more effectively. Second, we provide strategic analysis, advice and evaluation to international donor agencies and funders to improve the way that international governance support is developed and delivered.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston

126 High St, Boston, Massachusetts, 02110, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

JCRC’s purpose is to define and advance the values, interests and priorities of the organized Jewish community of Greater Boston in the public square. To achieve our shared values effectively, JCRC and the Greater Boston Jewish community work toward a strong infrastructure of community relations, articulated through building our community’s connection and commitment to civil society, developing the next generation of Jewish leaders, weaving a strong network of Jewish organizations, and investing in deep ties with actors in the public square.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gp-governance.jpeg
Global Partners Governance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jcrcboston.jpeg
Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Global Partners Governance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Global Partners Governance in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston in 2025.

Incident History — Global Partners Governance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Global Partners Governance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gp-governance.jpeg
Global Partners Governance
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jcrcboston.jpeg
Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Global Partners Governance company and Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Global Partners Governance company.

In the current year, Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston company and Global Partners Governance company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston company nor Global Partners Governance company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston company nor Global Partners Governance company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston company nor Global Partners Governance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Global Partners Governance company nor Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Global Partners Governance nor Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Global Partners Governance company nor Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Global Partners Governance company employs more people globally than Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Global Partners Governance nor Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Global Partners Governance nor Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Global Partners Governance nor Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Global Partners Governance nor Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Global Partners Governance nor Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Global Partners Governance nor Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N