Comparison Overview

The WINE Magazine

VS

Pan Macmillan

The WINE Magazine

303/30-40 Harcourt Parade , Rosebery, New South Wales, 2018, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Things have changed since we launched more than 20 years ago. With the ever-popular, bi-monthly print magazine still at its core, the brand has evolved to encompass a number of other exciting projects that deliver the latest on wine, food and travel to both Australia and elsewhere. The multi-award-winning digital edition of the magazine has had an impact in both local and overseas markets, while our Apple News+ presence is reaching more than a million users in Australia, the US, the UK and Canada each issue. The WINE Magazine's social media leads the way when it comes to the exchange of relevant information and supports the various WINE Mag initiatives. The WINE Magazine's regular reader and corporate events bring the pages of the magazine to life, enabling those who attend to enjoy the wines and food as well as destinations the wine experts recommend at bespoke, money-can’t-buy experiences including curated tastings, unique dinners and travel opportunities held throughout the year.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pan Macmillan

The Smithson, London, undefined, EC1M 5NR, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

At Pan Macmillan we publish a broad and vibrant range of books for audiences of all ages from dazzling bestsellers to influential prize-winners; books to inspire lifelong readers and listeners to enduring classics for generations to come. The fourth largest UK publisher, we pride ourselves on publishing successfully and sustainably and are committed to working together to positively impact culture and society at large. Our brilliant authors and illustrators include: Dapo Adeola, Tomi Adeyemi, Kate and Kay Allinson, Pam Ayres, David Baldacci, Floella Benjamin, Nancy Birtwhistle, Olivie Blake, Rod Campbell, Cassandra Clare, Ann Cleeves, Hernan Diaz, Emma Donoghue, Carol Ann Duffy, Julia Donaldson, Allie Esiri, Andy Griffiths, Kristin Hannah, France Hardinge, Robert Hardman, Natalie Haynes, Lenny Henry, Alan Hollinghurst, Morgan Housel, Peter James, Toshikazu Kawaguchi, Vex King, Casey McQuiston, Lydia Monks, Kate Morton, Kate Mosse, David Olusoga, John Patrick Green, Alexandra Potter, Patrick Radden Keefe, TJ Klune, Marcus Rashford, Camilla Reid, Chris Riddell, Lucinda Riley, CJ Sansom, Axel Scheffler, Danielle Steel, Douglas Stuart, Karen Swan, Adrian Tchaikovsky, Colm Tóibín, Louis Theroux, Leah Williamson and Hanya Yanighara. Macmillan was founded in 1843 by Daniel and Alexander Macmillan, two brothers from a crofting family on the Scottish Isle of Arran: Daniel was the business brain, while Alexander laid the literary foundations, publishing great authors and poets including Lewis Carroll, Christina Rosetti and Thomas Hardy. Pan was founded 100 years later by Alan Bott and became one of the first popular paperback publishers in the UK. Pan published many famous authors for the first time in paperback, including Ian Fleming and Agatha Christie. In 1987, Pan became wholly owned by Macmillan and the company became known as Pan Macmillan.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 361
Subsidiaries: 26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gourmet-traveller-wine.jpeg
The WINE Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pan-macmillan.jpeg
Pan Macmillan
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The WINE Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pan Macmillan
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The WINE Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pan Macmillan in 2025.

Incident History — The WINE Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The WINE Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pan Macmillan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pan Macmillan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gourmet-traveller-wine.jpeg
The WINE Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pan-macmillan.jpeg
Pan Macmillan
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized access to data security system
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Pan Macmillan company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The WINE Magazine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Pan Macmillan company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The WINE Magazine company has not reported any.

In the current year, Pan Macmillan company and The WINE Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Pan Macmillan company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while The WINE Magazine company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Pan Macmillan company has disclosed at least one data breach, while The WINE Magazine company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Pan Macmillan company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while The WINE Magazine company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The WINE Magazine company nor Pan Macmillan company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The WINE Magazine nor Pan Macmillan holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Pan Macmillan company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The WINE Magazine company.

Pan Macmillan company employs more people globally than The WINE Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither The WINE Magazine nor Pan Macmillan holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The WINE Magazine nor Pan Macmillan holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The WINE Magazine nor Pan Macmillan holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The WINE Magazine nor Pan Macmillan holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The WINE Magazine nor Pan Macmillan holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The WINE Magazine nor Pan Macmillan holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.