Comparison Overview

GotPrint

VS

Fingerprint FO+

GotPrint

7651 N. San Fernando Rd., Burbank, 91505, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

GotPrint.com is an online printer assisting consumers and small- to medium-sized businesses with their print, design and marketing needs. We utilize the most modern and innovative equipment and products in the printing industry. Our mission is to deliver high-quality, environmentally friendly products at cost-effective prices. In 2001, GotPrint started out as a small, family-run business in Toluca Lake, California, with a goal that would soon become a tradition: to provide fast, economical, and convenient service without sacrificing quality. In no time at all, this steadfast tradition helped us evolve into a continually growing and dependable company. Just five years later, GotPrint acquired four locations in: Burbank CA, Kentucky, Texas and an international location in The Netherlands, Europe. With these new locations, and over 500 employees, we are able to cater to our growing customer base, while providing quality service and products at cost-effective prices. At GotPrint.com, we are proud to offer the highest quality custom online printing services for businesses and creative individuals. GotPrint reviews praise our quality printing and design services, plus we offer competitive pricing and fast, friendly customer service. Whether you are a business owner or a graphic designer, our large selection of products will help you fulfill all of your printing and print marketing needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 180
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fingerprint FO+

Units 2-3. Alders Court, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, AL7 1LT, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Established over 15 years ago with a wealth of experience and knowledge in Print and related industries, Fingerprint FO+ Ltd is a client focused, full service, printing company that offers complete solutions for client’s print requirements. Based in Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire we cater for clients nationally and internationally. We offer complete project management, from conception to execution and distribution. Our clients include large global brands, blue chip companies and small family run businesses. All are treated the same way and rely on us to deliver innovative solutions for their requirements and know that we are committed to striving for excellence in all aspects of the printing process.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gotprint.jpeg
GotPrint
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fingerprint-fo-.jpeg
Fingerprint FO+
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GotPrint
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fingerprint FO+
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GotPrint in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fingerprint FO+ in 2025.

Incident History — GotPrint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GotPrint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fingerprint FO+ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fingerprint FO+ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gotprint.jpeg
GotPrint
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fingerprint-fo-.jpeg
Fingerprint FO+
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GotPrint company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fingerprint FO+ company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fingerprint FO+ company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GotPrint company.

In the current year, Fingerprint FO+ company and GotPrint company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fingerprint FO+ company nor GotPrint company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fingerprint FO+ company nor GotPrint company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fingerprint FO+ company nor GotPrint company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GotPrint company nor Fingerprint FO+ company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GotPrint nor Fingerprint FO+ holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GotPrint company nor Fingerprint FO+ company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GotPrint company employs more people globally than Fingerprint FO+ company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither GotPrint nor Fingerprint FO+ holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GotPrint nor Fingerprint FO+ holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GotPrint nor Fingerprint FO+ holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GotPrint nor Fingerprint FO+ holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GotPrint nor Fingerprint FO+ holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GotPrint nor Fingerprint FO+ holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N