Comparison Overview

Gorton Center

VS

Sing for Hope

Gorton Center

400 East Illinois Road, Lake Forest, Illinois, 60045, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gortoncenter.org

"The gathering place in the heart of our community where people connect, converse, learn, listen, play, and perform."​ Gorton Community Center, a private 501(c)(3) nonprofit space, houses the John & Nancy Hughes Theater and provides, maintains, operates, and manages Gorton for educational, and cultural purposes and for the general welfare of residents of the region of all ages. Gorton also provides a supportive, collaborative environment for many of the community's other not-for-profit social service and cultural organizations.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Sing for Hope

undefined, New York, NY, 10005, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.singforhope.org

Sing for Hope harnesses the power of the arts to create a better world. Our creative programs bring hope, healing, and connection to millions of people in hospitals, schools, care facilities, refugee camps, transit hubs, and public spaces worldwide. A non-profit organization founded in New York City in response to the events of 9/11, Sing for Hope partners with hundreds of community-based organizations, mobilizes thousands of artists in creative service, and produces artist-created Sing for Hope Pianos across the US and around the world. The official Cultural Partner of the World Summit of Nobel Peace Laureates, Sing for Hope champions art for all because we believe the arts have an unmatched capacity to uplift, unite, and heal. Learn more at singforhope.org. facebook.com/sing4hope instagram.com/singforhope Sing for Hope is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 85
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gorton-center.jpeg
Gorton Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sing-for-hope.jpeg
Sing for Hope
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gorton Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sing for Hope
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gorton Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sing for Hope in 2025.

Incident History — Gorton Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gorton Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sing for Hope (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sing for Hope cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gorton-center.jpeg
Gorton Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sing-for-hope.jpeg
Sing for Hope
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Gorton Center company and Sing for Hope company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Sing for Hope company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gorton Center company.

In the current year, Sing for Hope company and Gorton Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sing for Hope company nor Gorton Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sing for Hope company nor Gorton Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sing for Hope company nor Gorton Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gorton Center company nor Sing for Hope company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gorton Center nor Sing for Hope holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gorton Center company nor Sing for Hope company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sing for Hope company employs more people globally than Gorton Center company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Gorton Center nor Sing for Hope holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gorton Center nor Sing for Hope holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gorton Center nor Sing for Hope holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gorton Center nor Sing for Hope holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gorton Center nor Sing for Hope holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gorton Center nor Sing for Hope holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References