Comparison Overview

Google Play

VS

NTT DATA, Inc.

Google Play

https://play.google.com/store, None, New York, NY, US, 10002
Last Update: 2025-11-20

Enjoy millions of the latest Android apps, games, music, movies, TV, books, magazines & more.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 187
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

NTT DATA, Inc.

undefined, Tokyo, undefined, undefined, JP
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

NTT DATA, Inc. is a trusted global innovator of business and technology services. We're committed to helping clients innovate, optimize and transform for long-term success. Our R&D investments help organizations and society move confidently and sustainably into the digital future. As a Global Top Employer, we have diverse experts in more than 50 countries and a robust partner ecosystem of established and start-up companies. Our services include business and technology consulting, data and artificial intelligence, industry solutions, as well as the development, implementation and management of applications, infrastructure, and connectivity.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 58,499
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/google-play.jpeg
Google Play
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-ntt.jpeg
NTT DATA, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Google Play
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NTT DATA, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Google Play has 270.37% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NTT DATA, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Google Play (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Google Play cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NTT DATA, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NTT DATA, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/google-play.jpeg
Google Play
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Malicious App
Motivation: Data Theft, Blackmail
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Mobile Application
Motivation: Blackmail, Harassment, Extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Mobile Applications
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-ntt.jpeg
NTT DATA, Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromise of Order Information Distribution System
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exploiting exposed/hard-coded credentials in cloud/source code repositories (AWS, Bitbucket, GitHub), Insider-assisted access, Weak network segmentation, Third-party vendor compromises (e.g., TMS, WMS, EDI systems), Staged data leaks for extortion pressure
Motivation: Financial Gain (Extortion), Reputational Damage, Operational Disruption (via data leaks)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

NTT DATA, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Google Play company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Google Play company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to NTT DATA, Inc. company.

In the current year, NTT DATA, Inc. and Google Play have reported a similar number of cyber incidents.

Google Play company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while NTT DATA, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both NTT DATA, Inc. company and Google Play company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Both NTT DATA, Inc. company and Google Play company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Neither Google Play company nor NTT DATA, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Google Play nor NTT DATA, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NTT DATA, Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Google Play company.

NTT DATA, Inc. company employs more people globally than Google Play company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Google Play nor NTT DATA, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Google Play nor NTT DATA, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Google Play nor NTT DATA, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Google Play nor NTT DATA, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Google Play nor NTT DATA, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Google Play nor NTT DATA, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H