Comparison Overview

Goodworks Public Relations (GWPR)

VS

International Mission of Mercy (IMM)

Goodworks Public Relations (GWPR)

1711 East Cesar Chavez, Austin, Texas 78702, US
Last Update: 2025-03-19 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Goodworks Public Relations (GWPR) is a full-service public relations firm delivering content-led digital marketing strategies. With a deep bench of expertise in public relations, social media, and online reputation management, we bring an innovative approach to communications. Founded in New York in 2009, GWPR moved back home to Texas in 2012. Infused with the entrepreneurial spirit of Austin, we provide communications strategy and service to our national and local partners. GWPRโ€™s smart, hard-working team delivers communications solutions that tell meaningful stories and connect brands to ever-evolving audiences.

NAICS: 54182
NAICS Definition: Public Relations Agencies
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

International Mission of Mercy (IMM)

United States 88 Headquarters Plaza Morristown, NJ 07960, Morristown, US
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

International Mission of Mercy (IMM) was founded in 1991 by Satish Mehtani, a veteran of disaster relief missions in Kuwait, Japan and at the World Trade Center following September 11, 2001. IMM is a certified 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization whose goals are to serve people of all cultures following natural or man-made disasters, including weather-related catastrophes and violent uprisings. Mr. Mehtani and his wife Sneh are honored and proud to live in freedom in the United States. To pay tribute to their good luck, they have pledged a portion of their resources from Mehtani Restaurant Group, a 30-year-old, national portfolio of seven fine-dining Indian, Pan-Asian and Italian restaurants, and an award-winning catered events business, to rebuild communities and care for affected populations around the world. The professional team committed to IMM includes renowned physicians in the fields of pediatrics, geriatrics, orthopedics, infectious disease, ophthalmology, pain management, obstetrics and gynecology, internal medicine, psychology, physical therapy, nuclear medicine and more. Also on the distinguished Board of Directors is a former U.S. Ambassador, a retired Major General USA, attorneys, the Manhattan Chamber of Commerce CEO and respected leaders in the community. IMM provides satellite feeding centers capable of serving up to 10,000 people per day, using foods and designing recipes common to the culture of the region.

NAICS: 54182
NAICS Definition: Public Relations Agencies
Employees: 22,415
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Goodworks Public Relations (GWPR)
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
International Mission of Mercy (IMM)
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Goodworks Public Relations (GWPR)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
International Mission of Mercy (IMM)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Relations and Communications Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Goodworks Public Relations (GWPR) in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Relations and Communications Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Mission of Mercy (IMM) in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Goodworks Public Relations (GWPR) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Goodworks Public Relations (GWPR) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” International Mission of Mercy (IMM) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Mission of Mercy (IMM) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Goodworks Public Relations (GWPR)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
International Mission of Mercy (IMM)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Goodworks Public Relations (GWPR) company and International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Goodworks Public Relations (GWPR) company.

In the current year, International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company and Goodworks Public Relations (GWPR) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company nor Goodworks Public Relations (GWPR) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company nor Goodworks Public Relations (GWPR) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company nor Goodworks Public Relations (GWPR) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Goodworks Public Relations (GWPR) company nor International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Goodworks Public Relations (GWPR) company nor International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company employs more people globally than Goodworks Public Relations (GWPR) company, reflecting its scale as a Public Relations and Communications Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.