Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GoodwinGoodwin
VS
DLA PiperDLA Piper
Goodwin

Goodwin

100 Northern Ave, Boston, 02210, US

Last Update: 29/06/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.goodwinlaw.com
691/1000Weak

At Goodwin, we live your business. We are a firm of insiders relentlessly focused on understanding the pulse within six industries: healthcare, investment funds, life sciences, private equity, real estate, and technology. This means that we deliver unprecedented clie...

NAICS:54111
NAICS Definition:Offices of Lawyers
Employees:3,950
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
DLA Piper

DLA Piper

Global, GB

Last Update: 08/10/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dlapiper.com
783/1000Fair

DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver excepti...

NAICS:54111
NAICS Definition:Offices of Lawyers
Employees:13,425
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Goodwin

Goodwin

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DLA Piper

DLA Piper

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

Goodwin has 30.07% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DLA Piper in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Goodwin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Goodwin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DLA Piper (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DLA Piper cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Goodwin

Goodwin

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GOO1782757665
🔒 Incident : Breach
GOO123027222
DLA Piper

DLA Piper

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Goodwin company and DLA Piper company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Goodwin company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Goodwin company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Goodwin company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Goodwin company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Goodwin company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Goodwin company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Goodwin company and DLA Piper company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Goodwin company and DLA Piper company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Goodwin company and DLA Piper company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Goodwin company and DLA Piper company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Goodwin and DLA Piper, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Goodwin and DLA Piper, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Goodwin or DLA Piper ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Goodwin or DLA Piper ?
Between Goodwin and DLA Piper, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Goodwin and DLA Piper, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-111369
SUMMARY

ClassroomIO through 1.0.0 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the PUT and DELETE /:lessonId lesson routes that allows any course member, including students, to modify lessons. Authenticated students can supply arbitrary lesson ids to change titles and stored HTML content or delete lessons in their course and in other courses and organizations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-15
UPDATED
Date2026-10-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-111368
SUMMARY

ClassroomIO through 1.0.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the Hono API course submission routes that allows course tutors or admins to modify submissions in other courses. Attackers can supply their own course id with another course's submission UUID to PUT or DELETE handlers to overwrite answers, grades, feedback, and grading status or delete submissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-15
UPDATED
Date2026-10-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-111367
SUMMARY

BillionMail through 4.9 contains a hard-coded cryptographic key vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to forge unsubscribe and subscribe-confirm JWTs by computing the key from shipped configuration constants. Attackers can submit forged tokens to /api/unsubscribe, /api/unsubscribe_new, or /api/subscribe/confirm to deactivate any contact or force confirmed subscriptions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-15
UPDATED
Date2026-10-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-111366
SUMMARY

cool-admin-midway through 8.0.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows department-limited admins to manage users outside their departments by supplying arbitrary user ids. Attackers holding sys:user:* permissions can call /admin/sys/user/info, update, or delete to read records, reset passwords and roles, or delete accounts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-15
UPDATED
Date2026-10-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-111365
SUMMARY

cool-admin-midway through 8.0.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows non-superadmin admins to read, modify, or delete other admins' roles by supplying arbitrary role ids. Attackers holding ordinary sys:role permissions can call /admin/sys/role/info, update, or delete with another admin's role id to rewrite menu and department grants, changing other users' effective access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-15
UPDATED
Date2026-10-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2