Comparison Overview

Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc.

VS

Hemlock Printers

Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc.

16 A Street, Burlington, MA, US, 01803
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.goodwaygroup-ma.com

Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. is a service driven Print, Mail and Fulfillment provider based in Burlington Massachusetts. We assist our clients with their print and electronic communications needs utilizing Inkjet Print, Digital Print, Offset Print and Web-to-Print Storefront solutions. Look to Goodway Group for: Brochures | Postcards | Manuals | Booklets | Personalized Statements | Flyers | Mailers | Promotional Items |Wide Format Print.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Hemlock Printers

7050 Buller Ave, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5J 4S4, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hemlock.com

North America’s top brands trust Hemlock for their printing needs. We deliver superior results through expert craftsmanship, advanced technology and sustainable print practices, with locations in Vancouver BC, Seattle WA, and San Francisco CA. Our 80,000 square foot printing facility houses five Heidelberg sheed-fed conventional and UV presses, two HP Indigo Digital Presses and a full-service bindery, producing a diverse array of products including marketing materials, publications, books, corporate communications and fine art prints. Hemlock’s talented team stays true to the company’s fundamental values of quality and innovation.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 136
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goodway-group-of-massachusetts-inc-.jpeg
Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hemlock-printers.jpeg
Hemlock Printers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hemlock Printers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hemlock Printers in 2025.

Incident History — Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hemlock Printers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hemlock Printers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goodway-group-of-massachusetts-inc-.jpeg
Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hemlock-printers.jpeg
Hemlock Printers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hemlock Printers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hemlock Printers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. company.

In the current year, Hemlock Printers company and Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hemlock Printers company nor Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hemlock Printers company nor Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hemlock Printers company nor Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. company nor Hemlock Printers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. nor Hemlock Printers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. company nor Hemlock Printers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hemlock Printers company employs more people globally than Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. nor Hemlock Printers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. nor Hemlock Printers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. nor Hemlock Printers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. nor Hemlock Printers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. nor Hemlock Printers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Goodway Group of Massachusetts, Inc. nor Hemlock Printers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References