Comparison Overview

Goodman Frost, PLLC

VS

Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C.

Goodman Frost, PLLC

20300 W. 12 Mile Rd Suite 101, Southfield, MI, 48076, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

In today’s overdrawn economy debtors are becoming more knowledgeable and skilled at evading current collection techniques. Although pre-suit collections can be successful via collection agencies, etc., the challenges creditors face today has made it increasingly necessary for “legal collections” to be made a part of a creditor’s overall collection strategy in order to compel a debtor to pay what is rightfully owed. Goodman Frost, PLLC has developed a comprehensive, systematic approach to collections that has an established rate of successful recoveries. We believe by giving every account the individual attention it requires by utilizing an established collection process followed by ultimately holding the debtor legally accountable, Goodman frost, PLLC provides unsurpassed results. Our talented team of lawyers, managers, collectors, paralegals and customer service representatives work tirelessly to make sure every case is given the utmost consideration so that we can provide resolution for our valued clients.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C.

4200 Cantera Dr, Suite 112, Warrenville, Illinois, US, 60555
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

A law firm offering services in the areas of medical malpractice and professional malpractice defense including the representation of all types of professional license holders in matters pending before the Illiniois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation. Our firm also specializes in other areas of insurance defense including automobile accidents, premises liability and business owner claims.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 93
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goodmanfrostpllc.jpeg
Goodman Frost, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cunningham-meyer-&-vedrine-pc.jpeg
Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Goodman Frost, PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Goodman Frost, PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. in 2025.

Incident History — Goodman Frost, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Goodman Frost, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goodmanfrostpllc.jpeg
Goodman Frost, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cunningham-meyer-&-vedrine-pc.jpeg
Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Goodman Frost, PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Goodman Frost, PLLC company.

In the current year, Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. company and Goodman Frost, PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. company nor Goodman Frost, PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. company nor Goodman Frost, PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. company nor Goodman Frost, PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Goodman Frost, PLLC company nor Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Goodman Frost, PLLC nor Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Goodman Frost, PLLC company nor Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. company employs more people globally than Goodman Frost, PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Goodman Frost, PLLC nor Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Goodman Frost, PLLC nor Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Goodman Frost, PLLC nor Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Goodman Frost, PLLC nor Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Goodman Frost, PLLC nor Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Goodman Frost, PLLC nor Cunningham Meyer & Vedrine, P.C. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X