Comparison Overview

Goodman

VS

Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Goodman

The Hayesbery, 1-11 Hayes Road Rosebery, Sydney, NSW, 2018, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

Goodman is a specialist global industrial property and digital infrastructure group. We own, develop and manage high-quality, sustainable properties that are close to consumers and provide essential infrastructure for the digital economy. Goodman operates in key consumer markets in 14 countries across Asia Pacific, Europe and the Americas. We are the largest property group listed on the Australian Securities Exchange and invest significantly alongside our capital partners in our investment Partnerships. But we’re more than that. We’re a collaborative team who work together to make a tangible difference for our customers, our people and the communities we operate in. We believe in innovation, determination, integrity and sustainability – and we strive to make space for greatness in everything we do. For more information on Goodman, please visit www.goodman.com

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1,545
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Suite 400, Austin, TX, US, 78746
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Austin, Texas-based Keller Williams, the world’s largest real estate franchise by agent count, has more than 1,100 offices and 176,000 agents. The franchise is also No. 1 in units and sales volume in the United States. Since 1983, the company has cultivated an agent-centric, technology-driven, and education-based culture that rewards agents as stakeholders. For more information, visit headquarters.kw.com.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 109,155
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goodman.jpeg
Goodman
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keller-williams-realty-llc.jpeg
Keller Williams Realty, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Goodman
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Keller Williams Realty, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Goodman in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Keller Williams Realty, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Goodman (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Goodman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Keller Williams Realty, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Keller Williams Realty, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goodman.jpeg
Goodman
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keller-williams-realty-llc.jpeg
Keller Williams Realty, LLC
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Goodman company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Keller Williams Realty, LLC company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Goodman company has not reported any.

In the current year, Keller Williams Realty, LLC company and Goodman company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Keller Williams Realty, LLC company nor Goodman company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Keller Williams Realty, LLC company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Goodman company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Keller Williams Realty, LLC company nor Goodman company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Goodman company nor Keller Williams Realty, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Goodman nor Keller Williams Realty, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Keller Williams Realty, LLC company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Goodman company.

Keller Williams Realty, LLC company employs more people globally than Goodman company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Neither Goodman nor Keller Williams Realty, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Goodman nor Keller Williams Realty, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Goodman nor Keller Williams Realty, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Goodman nor Keller Williams Realty, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Goodman nor Keller Williams Realty, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Goodman nor Keller Williams Realty, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H