Comparison Overview

Good Luck Publishers Limited

VS

The Booksmith

Good Luck Publishers Limited

415,Laxmideep 9, Laxminagar, Delhi, 110092, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Goodluck Publishers is one of the leading school books publishers in India today. We publish books for CBSE, ICSE and various State Boards. Our books range from Nursery to Class 10th level. The company has over 250 plus employees working across the nation. We currently supply books to over 10,000 schools across India. Head office of the company is located at Saharanpur(U.P), apart from which the company has offices at Delhi, Bhubaneshwar, Chennai, Ernakulam, Hyderabad, Guwahati, Nagpur. Our books are also studied internationally in countries such as Nepal, Pakistan, Bhutan, Middle East, Singapore and some African countries.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 157
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Booksmith

1644 Haight Street, San Francisco, 94117, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Founded in October 1976, The Booksmith is an independent bookstore located in the Haight Ashbury neighborhood of San Francisco. When first opened, the store was located at 1746 Haight Street, below the former I-Beam nightclub. In 1985, the store moved to its current location at 1644 Haight Street, about a block and a half from the intersection of Haight and Ashbury. The Booksmith caters to neighborhood residents as well as tourists seeking the counter-cultural ambience of Haight Street. The Booksmith is general interest bookshop and is a member of both the Northern California Independent Booksellers Association (NCIBA) and the American Booksellers Association (ABA).

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goodluck-publishers-limited.jpeg
Good Luck Publishers Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-booksmith.jpeg
The Booksmith
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Good Luck Publishers Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Booksmith
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Good Luck Publishers Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Booksmith in 2025.

Incident History — Good Luck Publishers Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Good Luck Publishers Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Booksmith (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Booksmith cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goodluck-publishers-limited.jpeg
Good Luck Publishers Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-booksmith.jpeg
The Booksmith
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Booksmith company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Good Luck Publishers Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Booksmith company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Good Luck Publishers Limited company.

In the current year, The Booksmith company and Good Luck Publishers Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Booksmith company nor Good Luck Publishers Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Booksmith company nor Good Luck Publishers Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Booksmith company nor Good Luck Publishers Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Good Luck Publishers Limited company nor The Booksmith company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Good Luck Publishers Limited nor The Booksmith holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Good Luck Publishers Limited company nor The Booksmith company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Good Luck Publishers Limited company employs more people globally than The Booksmith company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Good Luck Publishers Limited nor The Booksmith holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Good Luck Publishers Limited nor The Booksmith holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Good Luck Publishers Limited nor The Booksmith holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Good Luck Publishers Limited nor The Booksmith holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Good Luck Publishers Limited nor The Booksmith holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Good Luck Publishers Limited nor The Booksmith holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.