Comparison Overview

Goodlord

VS

Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners

Goodlord

undefined, London, England, E1 1EE, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.goodlord.co

WHO ARE WE? Goodlord is a cloud-based platform trusted by over 3000 agencies across the UK. WHAT DO WE DO? We make renting easy through automated digital transactions, cutting agency time and spend by 50-75%. This enables agencies to focus on growing their business and providing a better service. HOW WE DO IT? Goodlord creates a bespoke one-stop-shop by providing access to a dynamic suite of specialised services, including insurance, e-signing, referencing, e-payments, and more. WHO WE WORK WITH? Ambitious, dynamic agencies who aspire to offer a better, fairer service to landlords and tenants. www.goodlord.co [email protected] Twitter: @sogoodlord

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 244
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners

1855 Griffin Rd Suite A-330 Dania, Florida 33004, US
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799
https://www.fsresidential.com

FirstService Residential is North America’s leading residential community manager. We are the preferred partner of all kinds of HOAs, community associations and strata corporations in the U.S. and Canada. Our managed communities include: Low-, mid- and high-rise condominiums and cooperatives Single-family homes Master-planned, lifestyle and active adult communities Rental and commercial properties FirstService Residential combines industry experience with a local touch and personalized attention. Our associates deliver solutions and exceptional service that enhance property values, improve resident lifestyles and make a difference, every day, for the residents in the communities we manage. FirstService Residential is a subsidiary of FirstService Corporation, a North American leader in the property services sector.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goodlord.jpeg
Goodlord
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palm-beach-county-board-of-county-commissioners.jpeg
Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Goodlord
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Goodlord in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners in 2025.

Incident History — Goodlord (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Goodlord cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goodlord.jpeg
Goodlord
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palm-beach-county-board-of-county-commissioners.jpeg
Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Goodlord company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Goodlord company.

In the current year, Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners company and Goodlord company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners company nor Goodlord company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners company nor Goodlord company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners company nor Goodlord company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Goodlord company nor Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Goodlord nor Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Goodlord company nor Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Goodlord company employs more people globally than Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Neither Goodlord nor Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Goodlord nor Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Goodlord nor Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Goodlord nor Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Goodlord nor Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Goodlord nor Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The Bold Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘percentage’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.4.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The ComboServlet in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.2, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.5, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions does not limit the number or size of the files it will combine, which allows remote attackers to create very large responses that lead to a denial of service attack via the URL query string.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and create arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary files on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References