Comparison Overview

Goodcopy Visual Communications

VS

Lick & Stick Graphics

Goodcopy Visual Communications

110 Hamilton St., New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Goodcopy Visual Communications has been New Haven’s printer for the past 50 years. The full-service commercial printer offers graphic design, offset printing, digital printing, variable data printing (VDP), large format printing, bindery, direct mailing, customized web to print portals for online ordering and much more. Learn more about us and why #GoodMattersMost at https://goodcopy.com.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lick & Stick Graphics

Lick n Stick Graphics, Thorpe, tw20 8rx, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Lick & Stick Graphics have a wide variety of services to offer customers from Large format digital printing and graphic design through to bespoke samples, graphic installations, and Event Management. If you are starting a project we would be happy to offer expert advice on printing materials, printing processes, and installation to help you start the ball rolling. #largeformatprinting #visualmerchandising #tvproduction #retaildesign #experientialmarketing

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goodcopy-printing-&-digital-graphics.jpeg
Goodcopy Visual Communications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lick-n-stick-graphics.jpeg
Lick & Stick Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Goodcopy Visual Communications
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lick & Stick Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Goodcopy Visual Communications in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lick & Stick Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Goodcopy Visual Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Goodcopy Visual Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lick & Stick Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lick & Stick Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goodcopy-printing-&-digital-graphics.jpeg
Goodcopy Visual Communications
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lick-n-stick-graphics.jpeg
Lick & Stick Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Goodcopy Visual Communications company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lick & Stick Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lick & Stick Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Goodcopy Visual Communications company.

In the current year, Lick & Stick Graphics company and Goodcopy Visual Communications company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lick & Stick Graphics company nor Goodcopy Visual Communications company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lick & Stick Graphics company nor Goodcopy Visual Communications company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lick & Stick Graphics company nor Goodcopy Visual Communications company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Goodcopy Visual Communications company nor Lick & Stick Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Goodcopy Visual Communications nor Lick & Stick Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lick & Stick Graphics company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Goodcopy Visual Communications company.

Goodcopy Visual Communications company employs more people globally than Lick & Stick Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Goodcopy Visual Communications nor Lick & Stick Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Goodcopy Visual Communications nor Lick & Stick Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Goodcopy Visual Communications nor Lick & Stick Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Goodcopy Visual Communications nor Lick & Stick Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Goodcopy Visual Communications nor Lick & Stick Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Goodcopy Visual Communications nor Lick & Stick Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N