Comparison Overview

Gomez Law, APC

VS

Georgia Justice Project

Gomez Law, APC

3055 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1200, Los Angeles, California, 90012, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

At Gomez Law, APC, our mission is to provide the highest quality legal services to our clients so we can help them keep and grow their most valuable asset - their real estate. We fulfill our mission every day by using our experience in court against those entities that seek to tear their most precious asset from them using the legal system. We help them protect and grow their assets through the legal tools provided through Civil Litigation, Estate Planning, Trust Administration, and Probate. We are here to look out for your best interests. Call us today!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Georgia Justice Project

438 Edgewood Ave, Atlanta, GA, 30312, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Georgia Justice Project (GJP) strengthens our community by demonstrating a better way to represent and support individuals in the criminal justice system and reduce barriers to reentry. GJP promotes innovative change through direct legal representation, policy advocacy, education and coalition building. GJP has served low income people in Georgia who have been affected by the criminal justice system for over 35 years. GJP’s range of direct services include holistic criminal defense paired with social service support, as well as representation for criminal records issues, all provided free of charge. GJP travels statewide to educate individuals and service providers on criminal records issues, and has helped to pass 20 Georgia laws through advocacy efforts. GJP works to remove barriers to employment, housing, and other opportunities faced by those with a criminal record.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gomez-&-simone-llc.jpeg
Gomez Law, APC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgia-justice-project.jpeg
Georgia Justice Project
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gomez Law, APC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Georgia Justice Project
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gomez Law, APC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Georgia Justice Project in 2025.

Incident History — Gomez Law, APC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gomez Law, APC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Georgia Justice Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Georgia Justice Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gomez-&-simone-llc.jpeg
Gomez Law, APC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgia-justice-project.jpeg
Georgia Justice Project
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Gomez Law, APC company and Georgia Justice Project company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Georgia Justice Project company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gomez Law, APC company.

In the current year, Georgia Justice Project company and Gomez Law, APC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Georgia Justice Project company nor Gomez Law, APC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Georgia Justice Project company nor Gomez Law, APC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Georgia Justice Project company nor Gomez Law, APC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gomez Law, APC company nor Georgia Justice Project company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gomez Law, APC nor Georgia Justice Project holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gomez Law, APC company nor Georgia Justice Project company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Georgia Justice Project company employs more people globally than Gomez Law, APC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Gomez Law, APC nor Georgia Justice Project holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gomez Law, APC nor Georgia Justice Project holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gomez Law, APC nor Georgia Justice Project holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gomez Law, APC nor Georgia Justice Project holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gomez Law, APC nor Georgia Justice Project holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gomez Law, APC nor Georgia Justice Project holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X