Comparison Overview

Gomer Press

VS

Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp.

Gomer Press

Llandysul Enterprise Park, Llandysul, SA44 4JL, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://gomerprinting.co.uk

Established in 1892 and operating out of Llandysul, West Wales, Gomer specialise in book production, and our clients include many of the most quality conscious publishers, museums and galleries in the world. Gomer are one of the last full-service providers for colour books in the UK, offering repro and colour calibrated proofing as well as the full range of printing and binding options. Gomer run modern UV presses and have binding facilities in-house, including hardback binding, section sewing, case-making and foil blocking. Gomer specialise in full colour softback or hardback (case bound) books which are produced on our B1 Heidelberg XL106 LE-UV perfecting press and our Kolbus binding line.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp.

176 N Village Ave, None, Rockville Centre, New York, US, 11570
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
www.mercuryprintingcorp.com

Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. is a fifth-generation, family-owned envelope and commercial print provider with a longstanding tradition of delivering high-quality direct mail solutions. As a full-service direct mail provider, we offer end-to-end solutions for your print and mail needs. Our experience in the industry means we bring deep knowledge and skill to every project. And as a supplier, our ability to produce envelopes AND commercial print products sets us apart from the pack. We are a certified Women Business Enterprise (WBENC) and Disability:IN organization and pride ourselves on fostering diversity and inclusivity in the supply chain.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gomer-press.jpeg
Gomer Press
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mercury-envelope-printing-corp.jpeg
Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gomer Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gomer Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. in 2025.

Incident History — Gomer Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gomer Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gomer-press.jpeg
Gomer Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mercury-envelope-printing-corp.jpeg
Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gomer Press company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gomer Press company.

In the current year, Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. company and Gomer Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. company nor Gomer Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. company nor Gomer Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. company nor Gomer Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gomer Press company nor Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gomer Press nor Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gomer Press company nor Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gomer Press company employs more people globally than Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Gomer Press nor Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gomer Press nor Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gomer Press nor Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gomer Press nor Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gomer Press nor Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gomer Press nor Mercury Envelope & Printing Corp. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References