Comparison Overview

Goldtouch

VS

Sonder Design

Goldtouch

1320 Arrow Point Drive, Cedar Park, TX, 78613, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Goldtouch is the industry-leading creator of custom-comfort ergonomic technology products, including keyboards, mice, and accessories for your computer. Our products reduce the pain and discomfort so commonly associated with repetitive stress injuries (RSIs). We build products that adjust to each unique individual, allowing our product to be most effective and efficient. It’s our mission to provide a steady flow of ergonomic products and information to help mold your work space into a hub for productivity, innovation, and creativity. Our customers include Chevron, Google, Apple, Yahoo, eBay, Blue Cross Blue Shield and Toyota. Join our mission, as we strive for productivity through prevention.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sonder Design

National Innovation Centre 4 Cornwallis St, Suite 145, Sydney, NSW, AU, 25428
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Sonder means more than just technology. To us it is an approach to design. One that focuses on meticulous care and attention to detail. A goal to delight, surprise and connect with you. An obsession driven by simplicity and subtle beauty. sonder /SAHN-der// noun the realisation that each random passerby is living a life as vivid and complex as your own. Infinite possibilities at your fingertips. Our dynamic E Ink keyboard features 50 customisable keys for all your design, technology, editing and gaming needs. With app-specific layouts on the keys for all your applications, Sonder’s keyboard will intuitively swap between layouts. Create macros and hotkeys, switch between languages, imagination is your limit. Our elegant keyboard with transparent keys and a bespoke display it as much a work of art as it is a state of art.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goldtouchkeyboards.jpeg
Goldtouch
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sonder-design.jpeg
Sonder Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Goldtouch
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sonder Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Goldtouch in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sonder Design in 2025.

Incident History — Goldtouch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Goldtouch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sonder Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sonder Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goldtouchkeyboards.jpeg
Goldtouch
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sonder-design.jpeg
Sonder Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Goldtouch company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sonder Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sonder Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Goldtouch company.

In the current year, Sonder Design company and Goldtouch company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sonder Design company nor Goldtouch company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sonder Design company nor Goldtouch company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sonder Design company nor Goldtouch company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Goldtouch company nor Sonder Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Goldtouch nor Sonder Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Goldtouch company nor Sonder Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Goldtouch company employs more people globally than Sonder Design company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither Goldtouch nor Sonder Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Goldtouch nor Sonder Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Goldtouch nor Sonder Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Goldtouch nor Sonder Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Goldtouch nor Sonder Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Goldtouch nor Sonder Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H