Comparison Overview

Goldman Sachs

VS

Bloomberg

Goldman Sachs

200 West Street, New York, New York, US, 10282
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

We aspire to be the world’s most exceptional financial institution, united by our shared values of partnership, client service, integrity, and excellence. Operating at the center of capital markets, we act as one firm, mobilizing our people, capital, and ideas to deliver superior results across our clients’ most complex challenges. For 156 years, Goldman Sachs has delivered world-class execution on a global scale across our leading Global Banking & Markets and Asset & Wealth Management businesses. Apprenticeship is central to our culture, with hands-on coaching and access to leaders who bring decades of experience and expertise. With office locations around the world, we offer a broad range of career opportunities to those who insist on excellence and thrive on performance. Find our Social Media Disclosures here: gs.com/social-media-disclosures

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 65,766
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bloomberg

731 Lexington Ave., New York, NY, US, 10022
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Bloomberg is a global leader in business and financial information, delivering trusted data, news, and insights that bring transparency and efficiency, and fairness to markets. We help connect influential communities across the global financial ecosystem via reliable technology solutions that enable our customers to make more informed decisions and foster better collaboration.     We challenge the status quo through constant innovation. We collaborate broadly because we know that other perspectives matter. We put our customers first, as a guiding beacon. And we believe doing the right thing – by our people, our clients, and our communities – is the best thing for our business.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 25,443
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goldman-sachs.jpeg
Goldman Sachs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bloomberg.jpeg
Bloomberg
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Goldman Sachs
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bloomberg
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Goldman Sachs in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bloomberg in 2025.

Incident History — Goldman Sachs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Goldman Sachs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bloomberg (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bloomberg cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goldman-sachs.jpeg
Goldman Sachs
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bloomberg.jpeg
Bloomberg
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Goldman Sachs company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bloomberg company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bloomberg company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Goldman Sachs company.

In the current year, Bloomberg company and Goldman Sachs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bloomberg company nor Goldman Sachs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bloomberg company nor Goldman Sachs company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bloomberg company nor Goldman Sachs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Goldman Sachs company nor Bloomberg company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Goldman Sachs nor Bloomberg holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Bloomberg company and Goldman Sachs company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Goldman Sachs company employs more people globally than Bloomberg company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Goldman Sachs nor Bloomberg holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Goldman Sachs nor Bloomberg holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Goldman Sachs nor Bloomberg holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Goldman Sachs nor Bloomberg holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Goldman Sachs nor Bloomberg holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Goldman Sachs nor Bloomberg holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N