Comparison Overview

Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC

VS

Chepenik Trushin LLP

Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC

800 LaSalle Avenue, Minneapolis, MN, 55402, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Located in downtown Minneapolis, Goldenberg Lauricella has spent more than 37 years fighting for victims throughout the country. Goldenberg Lauricella has an established reputation as a skilled, tenacious protector of its clients’ rights. Our Minnesota personal injury lawyers have a broad range of experience and the ability to represent you if you’ve suffered an injury as a result of negligence. Areas of practice include defective medical devices, dangerous drugs, defective products, catastrophic personal injury, toxic exposure, wrongful death, medical malpractice, and auto cases. We offer free initial consultations to all prospective clients. During that consultation, we will listen to your story, evaluate your case, and advise you on how best to move forward. If you’ve been hurt and you need an experienced Minnesota personal injury lawyer or have been injured as a result of a defective drug or medical device, please call Goldenberg Lauricella today at 612-333-4662 for a free consultation.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Chepenik Trushin LLP

12550 Biscayne Boulevard, North Miami, Florida, 33181, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Chepenik Trushin LLP provides premier legal service to its clients in all matters related to estate planning, including Wills and Trusts, Asset Protection, Probate and Trust Administration, Business Planning, Probate and Trust Litigation and Guardianship Administration and Litigation. Our firm also handles Complex Business and Commercial Litigation, Insurance Defense and Professional Disciplinary Action Defense across numerous industries. We are experts on fee shifting and Attorney's fees disputes legal matters. With offices in North Miami that serve clients throughout the Miami area, State of Florida and even across the country, our firm consists of ten attorneys with expansive backgrounds and experience. Chepenik Trushin LLP has been recognized by Martindale-Hubbell for excellence, receiving its highest rating (AV Preeminent) for legal ability and strict adherence to the professional standards of conduct, ethics, reliability, and diligence. With more than 60 years of combined legal experience, our attorneys have developed a thorough understanding of what it takes to serve your needs and accomplish your goals. Our motto "Innovation, Integrity, Results"​. We invite you to explore our website at www.ctllp.com or give us a call at (305) 981-8889.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goldenberglaw-pllc.jpeg
Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chepenik-trushin-llp.jpeg
Chepenik Trushin LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chepenik Trushin LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chepenik Trushin LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chepenik Trushin LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chepenik Trushin LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goldenberglaw-pllc.jpeg
Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chepenik-trushin-llp.jpeg
Chepenik Trushin LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Chepenik Trushin LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Chepenik Trushin LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC company.

In the current year, Chepenik Trushin LLP company and Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chepenik Trushin LLP company nor Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chepenik Trushin LLP company nor Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chepenik Trushin LLP company nor Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC company nor Chepenik Trushin LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC nor Chepenik Trushin LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC company nor Chepenik Trushin LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Chepenik Trushin LLP company employs more people globally than Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC nor Chepenik Trushin LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC nor Chepenik Trushin LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC nor Chepenik Trushin LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC nor Chepenik Trushin LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC nor Chepenik Trushin LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Goldenberg Lauricella, PLLC nor Chepenik Trushin LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X