Comparison Overview

Golden Line

VS

Crossmark Graphics, Inc.

Golden Line

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://Golden-line.com

Golden Line is a printing press that was established in 1990. We have Flexible printing, Offset printing and Web printing. These types of printing allow us to produce, Self adhesive stickers, labels, film labels, IML, different types of boxes and brochures. In addition, in order to improve our quality, we integrated the GMG System to guarantee our clients the exact colour degree required.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 142
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Crossmark Graphics, Inc.

16100 West Overland Drive, None, New Berlin, WI, US, 53151
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.crossmarkgraphicsinc.com

Crossmark Graphics is a family-owned business and a direct manufacturer of printing solutions that also purchases promotional material for some of the most recognizable brands in the United States. We have the ability to make crucial decisions quickly, before small problems have a chance to affect job quality. We handle virtually everything in-house, keeping each aspect of your job under a critical microscope as it takes shape, from planning through delivery. Our engineering department is always looking for ways to produce your job in the most economical way possible while meeting our quality benchmarks and delivering the latest innovations. Our clients value Crossmark Graphics as a strategic partner and not part of a billion-dollar conglomerate or holding company. Our owners are directly involved with each aspect of your business to help insure that you are receiving the best pricing by leveraging our suppliers and showing you new efficiencies. We offer a full spectrum of services including: LED UV printing 40", Cold-Foil Printing, 20 x 26 Digital Printing, Large Format Digital, Lenticular, Creative Department, Pre-Press, Die-Cutting, Folders Gluers, Ink-jetting and mailing capabilities, Finishing, Fulfillment/Kit Packing/Warehousing. The result is a harmonious working environment that attracts extraordinarily gifted co-workers that care deeply about consistently making you happy.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/golden-line.jpeg
Golden Line
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crossmark-graphics-inc..jpeg
Crossmark Graphics, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Golden Line
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Crossmark Graphics, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Golden Line in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crossmark Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Golden Line (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Golden Line cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Crossmark Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crossmark Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/golden-line.jpeg
Golden Line
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crossmark-graphics-inc..jpeg
Crossmark Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Golden Line company and Crossmark Graphics, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Crossmark Graphics, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Golden Line company.

In the current year, Crossmark Graphics, Inc. company and Golden Line company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Crossmark Graphics, Inc. company nor Golden Line company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Crossmark Graphics, Inc. company nor Golden Line company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Crossmark Graphics, Inc. company nor Golden Line company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Golden Line company nor Crossmark Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Golden Line nor Crossmark Graphics, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Golden Line company nor Crossmark Graphics, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Golden Line company employs more people globally than Crossmark Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Golden Line nor Crossmark Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Golden Line nor Crossmark Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Golden Line nor Crossmark Graphics, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Golden Line nor Crossmark Graphics, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Golden Line nor Crossmark Graphics, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Golden Line nor Crossmark Graphics, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References