Comparison Overview

GoldBet

VS

Pala Casino Spa and Resort

GoldBet

Via della Maglianella, 65, Rome, 00166, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

GoldBet è un nuovo Concessionario di Stato Italiano per le scommesse ed il gioco a distanza, con sede a Roma, che opera in Italia con una rete di punti vendita (PdV) ed un’offerta completa attraverso il canale online/mobile. In Italia GoldBet garantisce oggi la presenza di una rete costituita da 989 PdV autorizzati, in 18 diverse regioni. Attraverso il canale online/mobile, tramite il sito www.goldbet.it propone un’offerta completa con scommesse, giochi da casinò, poker, bingo e skill game.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 655
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pala Casino Spa and Resort

11154 Highway 76, Pala, 92059, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Pala Casino Spa & Resort includes a Las Vegas-style casino with 2,000 slot machines, 8-table poker room that hosts live play and championship tournaments and 87 table games; a 507-room hotel; a 10,000-square-foot, full-service spa and salon that features 14 treatment rooms; a state-of-the-art fitness center; swimming pool with 12 private poolside cabanas, and dual-temperature outdoor whirlpool. Pala also offers 10 restaurants and 40,000 square feet of meeting and convention space.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 749
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goldbet.jpeg
GoldBet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pala-casino-spa-and-resort.jpeg
Pala Casino Spa and Resort
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GoldBet
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pala Casino Spa and Resort
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GoldBet in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pala Casino Spa and Resort in 2025.

Incident History — GoldBet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GoldBet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pala Casino Spa and Resort (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pala Casino Spa and Resort cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goldbet.jpeg
GoldBet
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pala-casino-spa-and-resort.jpeg
Pala Casino Spa and Resort
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both GoldBet company and Pala Casino Spa and Resort company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Pala Casino Spa and Resort company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GoldBet company.

In the current year, Pala Casino Spa and Resort company and GoldBet company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pala Casino Spa and Resort company nor GoldBet company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pala Casino Spa and Resort company nor GoldBet company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pala Casino Spa and Resort company nor GoldBet company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GoldBet company nor Pala Casino Spa and Resort company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GoldBet nor Pala Casino Spa and Resort holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GoldBet company nor Pala Casino Spa and Resort company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pala Casino Spa and Resort company employs more people globally than GoldBet company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither GoldBet nor Pala Casino Spa and Resort holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GoldBet nor Pala Casino Spa and Resort holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GoldBet nor Pala Casino Spa and Resort holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GoldBet nor Pala Casino Spa and Resort holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GoldBet nor Pala Casino Spa and Resort holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GoldBet nor Pala Casino Spa and Resort holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H