Comparison Overview

GoldBet

VS

Grand Victoria Casino

GoldBet

Via della Maglianella, 65, Rome, 00166, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

GoldBet è un nuovo Concessionario di Stato Italiano per le scommesse ed il gioco a distanza, con sede a Roma, che opera in Italia con una rete di punti vendita (PdV) ed un’offerta completa attraverso il canale online/mobile. In Italia GoldBet garantisce oggi la presenza di una rete costituita da 989 PdV autorizzati, in 18 diverse regioni. Attraverso il canale online/mobile, tramite il sito www.goldbet.it propone un’offerta completa con scommesse, giochi da casinò, poker, bingo e skill game.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 655
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Grand Victoria Casino

250 South Grove Avenue, Elgin, Illinois, 60120, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Grand Victoria Casino is located in Elgin, Illinois, just 45 minutes from Chicago. As Chicagoland’s premier gaming establishment, Grand Victoria Casino takes pride in its unparalleled customer service and offers exhilarating gaming action with over 1,100 slots and Vegas-style table games, acclaimed gaming promotions and giveaways, weekly live entertainment, four extraordinary restaurants, including award-winning Buckinghams Steakhouse & Lounge and Prime BurgerHouse. With its commitment to excellence, Grand Victoria Casino is a gaming, dining, and entertainment destination not to be missed. Grand Victoria Casino, a business leader and employer of choice committed to giving back to the community, offers a wide range of career opportunities with great benefits and a fun work environment. Our guest-centric philosophy empowers our talented team to consistently create exciting and memorable experiences for our guests. Explore our list of job openings to find the right one for you!

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 293
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goldbet.jpeg
GoldBet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grand-victoria-casino.jpeg
Grand Victoria Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GoldBet
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grand Victoria Casino
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GoldBet in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grand Victoria Casino in 2025.

Incident History — GoldBet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GoldBet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grand Victoria Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grand Victoria Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goldbet.jpeg
GoldBet
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grand-victoria-casino.jpeg
Grand Victoria Casino
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GoldBet company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Grand Victoria Casino company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Grand Victoria Casino company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GoldBet company.

In the current year, Grand Victoria Casino company and GoldBet company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grand Victoria Casino company nor GoldBet company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Grand Victoria Casino company nor GoldBet company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Grand Victoria Casino company nor GoldBet company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GoldBet company nor Grand Victoria Casino company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GoldBet nor Grand Victoria Casino holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GoldBet company nor Grand Victoria Casino company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GoldBet company employs more people globally than Grand Victoria Casino company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither GoldBet nor Grand Victoria Casino holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GoldBet nor Grand Victoria Casino holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GoldBet nor Grand Victoria Casino holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GoldBet nor Grand Victoria Casino holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GoldBet nor Grand Victoria Casino holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GoldBet nor Grand Victoria Casino holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H