Comparison Overview

Gold Rush Amusements, Inc.

VS

Fortune Gaming

Gold Rush Amusements, Inc.

undefined, Hoffman Estates, IL , 60192 , US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Gold Rush Gaming is a full service Licensed Terminal Operator who specializes in Video Gaming. Since opening in 2012, Gold Rush has grown into one of the most respected and sought out Terminal Operators. With over 700 locations statewide, we provide unparalleled dedication and proven gaming knowledge. Join The Gold Standard!

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fortune Gaming

3650 E Valley Rd, Renton, Washington, 98057, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

TIL Gaming is a small casino management company. We utilize functional insights gained over years of direct casino operations experience at the highest executive levels. Our team of specialists includes management operations, finance, marketing, human resources, and other disciplines. TIL Gaming has a proven record of success influencing all critical areas of casino operations: Table Games Operations Food & Beverage Marketing, Sales & Advertising Finance & Accounting Human Resources Security & Surveillance Facilities and IT

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gold-rush-gaming-amusements-inc-.jpeg
Gold Rush Amusements, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/til-gaming.jpeg
Fortune Gaming
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gold Rush Amusements, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fortune Gaming
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fortune Gaming in 2025.

Incident History — Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fortune Gaming (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fortune Gaming cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gold-rush-gaming-amusements-inc-.jpeg
Gold Rush Amusements, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/til-gaming.jpeg
Fortune Gaming
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fortune Gaming company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fortune Gaming company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. company.

In the current year, Fortune Gaming company and Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fortune Gaming company nor Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fortune Gaming company nor Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fortune Gaming company nor Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. company nor Fortune Gaming company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. nor Fortune Gaming holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. company nor Fortune Gaming company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. company employs more people globally than Fortune Gaming company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. nor Fortune Gaming holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. nor Fortune Gaming holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. nor Fortune Gaming holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. nor Fortune Gaming holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. nor Fortune Gaming holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gold Rush Amusements, Inc. nor Fortune Gaming holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H