Comparison Overview

Gold's Gym

VS

LA Fitness

Gold's Gym

5420 Lyndon B Johnson Fwy, Dallas, Texas, 75240, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Gold’s Gym has been the world’s trusted fitness authority since 1965. From its beginning as a small gym in Venice, California, Gold’s Gym has grown into a global icon with more than 700 locations serving 3 million people across six continents each day. Whether you are an industry professional or interested in pursuing a dream to make your passion for Fitness a meaningful reality, we want to help you transform your life. Our journey started on a beach in California, yours starts today. Join our Talent Network to receive updates on open positions. http://www.goldsgym.com/join-our-team

NAICS: 71394
NAICS Definition: Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees: 15,763
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LA Fitness

PO Box 55088, Irvine, California, 92619, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

LA Fitness is a privately owned fitness club chain. LA Fitness has hundreds of health clubs gyms and millions of members across US and Canada. In an industry often equated with fad and fashion, LA Fitness has steadily increased its presence by focusing on the one lifelong benefit valued by everyone: good health. Established in Southern California in 1984, LA Fitness continues to seek innovative ways to enhance the wellbeing of its members. Today, LA Fitness’ state-of-the-art clubs span the continent and continue to expand. LA Fitness’ strong and successful growth stems from its commitment to understanding and meeting the distinct needs of each community it serves. With a wide range of amenities and a highly trained staff, LA Fitness can provide fun and effective workout options to family members of all ages and interests. Website - http://www.lafitness.com Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/LAFitness Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/LAFitness Google+ - https://plus.google.com/+lafitness YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/lafitness

NAICS: 71394
NAICS Definition: Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees: 14,288
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gold's-gym.jpeg
Gold's Gym
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/la-fitness.jpeg
LA Fitness
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gold's Gym
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LA Fitness
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gold's Gym in 2025.

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LA Fitness in 2025.

Incident History — Gold's Gym (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gold's Gym cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LA Fitness (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LA Fitness cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gold's-gym.jpeg
Gold's Gym
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/la-fitness.jpeg
LA Fitness
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gold's Gym company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LA Fitness company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LA Fitness company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gold's Gym company.

In the current year, LA Fitness company and Gold's Gym company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LA Fitness company nor Gold's Gym company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LA Fitness company nor Gold's Gym company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LA Fitness company nor Gold's Gym company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gold's Gym company nor LA Fitness company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gold's Gym nor LA Fitness holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gold's Gym company nor LA Fitness company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gold's Gym company employs more people globally than LA Fitness company, reflecting its scale as a Wellness and Fitness Services.

Neither Gold's Gym nor LA Fitness holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gold's Gym nor LA Fitness holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gold's Gym nor LA Fitness holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gold's Gym nor LA Fitness holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gold's Gym nor LA Fitness holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gold's Gym nor LA Fitness holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H