Comparison Overview

Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC

VS

Clancy & Triado

Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC

6609 WillowPark Drive, Naples, FL, 34109, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

At Goede, Adamczyk, DeBoest & Cross, we have one mission: to achieve an outcome with a cost effective solution. This means working strategically and expeditiously on your behalf. And it’s our pleasure. Our tradition of integrity is reflected in our rich and varied long-term client relationships, all built on mutual respect. We advocate passionately and thoroughly and consider it a privilege to serve as a trusted, knowledgeable advisor. Even our breadth of services supports our uniquely fluid processes—ones that seamlessly blend needs and wants with rights and legally sound remedies. Our attorneys are thoughtful and collaborative. Our desire to learn and stay atop of the latest changes in the law is unquenchable. And our deep expertise has earned us roles as educators, presenters, authors, columnists and true industry leaders, defining the law as often as we defend it. There’s no question that we are driven by a profound passion for the law. But our greatest force is pouring decades of experience into making sure the law does right by you. We provide our clients with professional, high quality, experienced representation in a broad range of matters including community association law, real estate, commercial litigation, estate planning, probate, corporate and business law, banking and financial services, family law, insurance coverage and carrier representation, personal injury, medical malpractice, class actions, and mass torts. The Firm’s multidiscipline approach allows us to handle complex matters without bringing in outside counsel which increases efficiency, saving our client’s both time and money.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Clancy & Triado

610 Glenferrie Road, Hawthorn, Victoria, 3122, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Clancy & Triado is a specialist family law firm with over 50 years of experience. Our founder, Patricia Clancy AM, was a pioneer in the practise of family law in Australia and her award of the Order of Australia was granted for her services to family law. Patricia built a reputation for excellence and professionalism, which our team of family lawyers continue to emulate. With a commitment to ongoing education and development, 9 of our lawyers are now recognised as accredited specialists in the family law area. At Clancy & Triado our lawyers take a holistic view of ever case, while at the same time representing our clients in the best possible manner. We realise a relationship breakdown is the most stressful time in your life so we strive to help you through this period by achieving the best possible outcome while at the same time, minimising damage to the family, the children and your finances. We view Court as the last resort not a first resort – we focus on settlement and the best outcome for you and only use Court when that cannot be achieved. Our lawyers represent clients in many facets of family law, including the most complex matters involving international relocation of clients, overseas assets, trusts, businesses and tax matters arising from those arrangements. We do divorces, parenting arrangements, child support, same sex law and of course pre-nuptial agreements. To achieve the best outcomes for our clients we liaise closely with fellow health professionals, financial professionals, accountants, advisors, valuers and forensic accountants. We also provide services for estate planning including reworking your finances after separation, reviewing your position, making your Will and if necessary, creating testamentary trusts for your future beneficiaries. At Clancy & Triado, we tell your story and put your circumstances in the best possible light. We are your advocates, advisors and counsel.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goede-adamczyk-&-deboest-pllc-.jpeg
Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clancy&triado.jpeg
Clancy & Triado
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Clancy & Triado
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clancy & Triado in 2025.

Incident History — Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Clancy & Triado (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clancy & Triado cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goede-adamczyk-&-deboest-pllc-.jpeg
Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clancy&triado.jpeg
Clancy & Triado
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC company and Clancy & Triado company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Clancy & Triado company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC company.

In the current year, Clancy & Triado company and Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Clancy & Triado company nor Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Clancy & Triado company nor Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Clancy & Triado company nor Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC company nor Clancy & Triado company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC nor Clancy & Triado holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC company nor Clancy & Triado company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC company employs more people globally than Clancy & Triado company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC nor Clancy & Triado holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC nor Clancy & Triado holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC nor Clancy & Triado holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC nor Clancy & Triado holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC nor Clancy & Triado holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Goede, DeBoest & Cross, PLLC nor Clancy & Triado holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X