Comparison Overview

Godiva Chocolatier

VS

MBRF

Godiva Chocolatier

333 W 34th St, None, New York, None, US, None
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://pladisglobal.com/

GODIVA Chocolatier is a global leader in premium, artisanal chocolate. The company was founded in Brussels in 1926 by Belgian Chocolatier, Pierre Draps. Nearly a century later, every piece of GODIVA chocolate is still bursting with quality, Belgian craftsmanship, and the world’s finest ingredients. GODIVA has distribution in more than 100 countries across the globe. Customers can experience GODIVA at the iconic brand’s chocolate boutiques, chocolate cafes, GODIVA.com, and at many fine retailers.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 1,875
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
View Profile

MBRF

Av das Nações Unidas, N° 14.401 , 24º andar – Torre Jequitibá, São Paulo, SP, BR, 04730-090
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 800 and 849
http://mbrf-global-foods-company

We are one of the leading global producers and exporters of quality food, as we believe it is fundamental to a better life for all people. Not only what we do, but the way we do it, is guided by the purpose of a better life for everyone, from farm to fork. That is why we conduct a sustainable management of our chain, which is vivid, long and complex. In our chain, it is vital to know how to manage interdependence, appreciate knowledge and the development of people and their diversity, ensure efficiency and always innovate. That is how we guarantee our results. We never relinquish Safety, Quality and Integrity to reach our goals and, guided by these fundamental commitments, we maintain operations in more than 127 countries, we are responsible for iconic and beloved brands such as Sadia, Perdigão and Qualy, and own over 35 production plants, 40 distribution plants, in addition to more than 4,000 products and 4.5 million tons of food sold around the globe. Producing food in a way that improves the lives of so many people worldwide is a fascinating challenge. This is our greatest passion.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 53,436
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/godiva-chocolatier.jpeg
Godiva Chocolatier
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mbrf-global-foods-company.jpeg
MBRF
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Godiva Chocolatier
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MBRF
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Godiva Chocolatier in 2026.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MBRF in 2026.

Incident History — Godiva Chocolatier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Godiva Chocolatier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MBRF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MBRF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/godiva-chocolatier.jpeg
Godiva Chocolatier
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft/Loss
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mbrf-global-foods-company.jpeg
MBRF
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MBRF company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Godiva Chocolatier company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Godiva Chocolatier company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas MBRF company has not reported any.

In the current year, MBRF company and Godiva Chocolatier company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MBRF company nor Godiva Chocolatier company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Godiva Chocolatier company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other MBRF company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither MBRF company nor Godiva Chocolatier company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Godiva Chocolatier company nor MBRF company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Godiva Chocolatier nor MBRF holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Godiva Chocolatier company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MBRF company.

MBRF company employs more people globally than Godiva Chocolatier company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Services.

Neither Godiva Chocolatier nor MBRF holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Godiva Chocolatier nor MBRF holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Godiva Chocolatier nor MBRF holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Godiva Chocolatier nor MBRF holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Godiva Chocolatier nor MBRF holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Godiva Chocolatier nor MBRF holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References