Comparison Overview

Go To Court Lawyers

VS

Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd

Go To Court Lawyers

7/320 Adelaide Street, Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Go To Court's team works closely with hundreds of solicitors across the country who have been selected to join the gotocourt.com.au network on the basis of their experience and local knowledge. The result? A powerful legal fraternity that provides affordable legal representation in Criminal, Family and Civil cases, in any court of Australia.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd

Ribban Court, Warrington, undefined, WA2 7NG, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Elite Law provides Law Cost Drafting services to solicitors throughout England and Wales. We offer bespoke training solutions tailored to your firms individual needs, technical advice on the ever more complex area of legal costs. If you choose Elite Law you choose a results focused partner that is meticulous about service, passionate about offering a practical and pragmatic approach, whilst also providing value for money. Elite Laws focus is on improving your profitability and ensuring quick settlement. We offer outsourced Cost Drafting and Negotiation solutions that will help your business attain the results you desire on time every time.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/go-to-court.jpeg
Go To Court Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elite-law-cost-drafting-ltd.jpeg
Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Go To Court Lawyers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Go To Court Lawyers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Go To Court Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Go To Court Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/go-to-court.jpeg
Go To Court Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elite-law-cost-drafting-ltd.jpeg
Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Go To Court Lawyers company and Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Go To Court Lawyers company.

In the current year, Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd company and Go To Court Lawyers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd company nor Go To Court Lawyers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd company nor Go To Court Lawyers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd company nor Go To Court Lawyers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Go To Court Lawyers company nor Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Go To Court Lawyers nor Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Go To Court Lawyers company nor Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Go To Court Lawyers company employs more people globally than Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Go To Court Lawyers nor Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Go To Court Lawyers nor Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Go To Court Lawyers nor Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Go To Court Lawyers nor Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Go To Court Lawyers nor Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Go To Court Lawyers nor Elite Law Cost Drafting Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X