Comparison Overview

Teleport

VS

Xiaomi Technology

Teleport

2100 Franklin St, Floor 4, Oakland, California, US, 94612
Last Update: 2025-12-23
Between 750 and 799

Teleport is the AI Infrastructure Identity Company, modernizing identity, access, and policy for infrastructure, improving engineering velocity and infrastructure resiliency against human factors and compromise.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 260
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Xiaomi Technology

No. 33 Xi erqi Middle Road, Haidian District, Beijing,100085,China, Beijing, Beijing, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 800 and 849

Xiaomi Corporation was founded in April 2010 and listed on the Main Board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on July 9, 2018 (1810.HK). Xiaomi is a consumer electronics and smart manufacturing company with smartphones and smart hardware connected by an IoT platform at its core. Embracing our vision of “Make friends with users and be the coolest company in the users’ hearts”, Xiaomi continuously pursues innovations, high-quality user experience and operational efficiency. The company relentlessly builds amazing products with honest prices to let everyone in the world enjoy a better life through innovative technology. Xiaomi is one of the world's leading smartphone companies. The company has also established the world’s leading consumer AIoT (AI+IoT) platform,reached 558 million smart devices connected to its platform (excluding smartphones,laptops and tablets) as of September 30 2022. Xiaomi products are present in more than 100 countries and regions around the world. In August 2022, Xiaomi was included in the Fortune Global 500 list for the fourth year in a row, ranking 266th. The company is the fastest-rising Chinese technology conglomerate during the four-year period. Xiaomi is a constituent of the Hang Seng Index, Hang Seng China Enterprises Index, Hang Seng TECH Index and Hang Seng China 50 Index.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 22,103
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/go-teleport.jpeg
Teleport
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xiaomi-technology.jpeg
Xiaomi Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Teleport
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Xiaomi Technology
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Teleport has 63.93% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Xiaomi Technology in 2025.

Incident History — Teleport (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Teleport cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Xiaomi Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Xiaomi Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/go-teleport.jpeg
Teleport
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Authentication Bypass
Motivation: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xiaomi-technology.jpeg
Xiaomi Technology
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Interoperability application protocols
Motivation: Unauthorized access to victim devices
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Xiaomi Technology company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Teleport company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Teleport and Xiaomi Technology have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Teleport company has reported more cyber incidents than Xiaomi Technology company.

Neither Xiaomi Technology company nor Teleport company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Xiaomi Technology company nor Teleport company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Xiaomi Technology company nor Teleport company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Both Teleport company and Xiaomi Technology company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither Teleport nor Xiaomi Technology holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Teleport company nor Xiaomi Technology company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Xiaomi Technology company employs more people globally than Teleport company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Teleport nor Xiaomi Technology holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Teleport nor Xiaomi Technology holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Teleport nor Xiaomi Technology holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Teleport nor Xiaomi Technology holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Teleport nor Xiaomi Technology holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Teleport nor Xiaomi Technology holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 2.0.0, in self-hosted n8n instances where the Code node runs in legacy (non-task-runner) JavaScript execution mode, authenticated users with workflow editing access can invoke internal helper functions from within the Code node. This allows a workflow editor to perform actions on the n8n host with the same privileges as the n8n process, including: reading files from the host filesystem (subject to any file-access restrictions configured on the instance and OS/container permissions), and writing files to the host filesystem (subject to the same restrictions). This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve limiting file operations by setting N8N_RESTRICT_FILE_ACCESS_TO to a dedicated directory (e.g., ~/.n8n-files) and ensure it contains no sensitive data, keeping N8N_BLOCK_FILE_ACCESS_TO_N8N_FILES=true (default) to block access to .n8n and user-defined config files, and disabling high-risk nodes (including the Code node) using NODES_EXCLUDE if workflow editors are not fully trusted.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. From version 1.0.0 to before 2.0.0, a sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in the Python Code Node that uses Pyodide. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the host system running n8n, using the same privileges as the n8n process. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve disabling the Code Node by setting the environment variable NODES_EXCLUDE: "[\"n8n-nodes-base.code\"]", disabling Python support in the Code node by setting the environment variable N8N_PYTHON_ENABLED=false, which was introduced in n8n version 1.104.0, and configuring n8n to use the task runner based Python sandbox via the N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED and N8N_NATIVE_PYTHON_RUNNER environment variables.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving LLMs. Prior to version 0.11.1, an insecure deserialization vulnerability exists in lmdeploy where torch.load() is called without the weights_only=True parameter when loading model checkpoint files. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the victim's machine when they load a malicious .bin or .pt model file. This issue has been patched in version 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 1.114.0, a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability may occur in n8n when using the “Respond to Webhook” node. When this node responds with HTML content containing executable scripts, the payload may execute directly in the top-level window, rather than within the expected sandbox introduced in version 1.103.0. This behavior can enable a malicious actor with workflow creation permissions to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the n8n editor interface. This issue has been patched in version 1.114.0. Workarounds for this issue involve restricting workflow creation and modification privileges to trusted users only, avoiding use of untrusted HTML responses in the “Respond to Webhook” node, and using an external reverse proxy or HTML sanitizer to filter responses that include executable scripts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Yealink T21P_E2 Phone 52.84.0.15 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal. A remote normal privileged attacker can read arbitrary files via a crafted request result read function of the diagnostic component.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N