Comparison Overview

Go North Group

VS

Hallmark Consumer Services

Go North Group

None
Last Update: 2025-12-27
Between 750 and 799

Based in Gothenburg, Sweden, Go North was founded as an Amazon Aggregator. We acquired a portfolio of brands who primarily sold their products on Amazon in the USA. Today, we focus on delivering Products with Purpose to consumers in multiple regions of the world, developing better, new products and expanding our sales channels. At Go North, we have a simple purpose of solving people’s problems everyday.

NAICS: 4541
NAICS Definition: Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hallmark Consumer Services

Green Bank, Melton Mowbray, LE13 1FF, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-28

Established in 1992, Hallmark Consumer Services is an award-winning family-owned business specialising in fulfilment services and innovative direct mail, based in Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire. Our key aim is to deliver a level of commitment that’s second-to-none through our core principles of Flexibility, Reliability and Transparency. To reflect the growing importance of e-fulfilment we have created a dedicated business unit that specialises in providing these services to a growing client base. After a lot of hard work from everyone in the company we have recently achieved ISO9001 and ISO14001 standards in quality and environmental management. We are a multi-award winning company, having won: * The “Increased productivity through the use of IT” East Midlands Family eBusiness Award * National Training Award * The Best Small Business in Melton Mowbray * The BSS Supplier of the Year award * Royal Mail Mailing House Scheme (RMMHS) * Best Development of Talent Category Winner - Midlands Family Business Awards * Runners up in the Service Excellence Category 2011- Midlands Family Business Awards * Member of UK Warehousing Association (UKWA)

NAICS: 4541
NAICS Definition: Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/go-north-group.jpeg
Go North Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hallmark-consumer-services.jpeg
Hallmark Consumer Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Go North Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hallmark Consumer Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Go North Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hallmark Consumer Services in 2025.

Incident History — Go North Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Go North Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hallmark Consumer Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hallmark Consumer Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/go-north-group.jpeg
Go North Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hallmark-consumer-services.jpeg
Hallmark Consumer Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hallmark Consumer Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Go North Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hallmark Consumer Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Go North Group company.

In the current year, Hallmark Consumer Services company and Go North Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hallmark Consumer Services company nor Go North Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hallmark Consumer Services company nor Go North Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hallmark Consumer Services company nor Go North Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Go North Group company nor Hallmark Consumer Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Go North Group nor Hallmark Consumer Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Go North Group company nor Hallmark Consumer Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Go North Group company employs more people globally than Hallmark Consumer Services company, reflecting its scale as a Online and Mail Order Retail.

Neither Go North Group nor Hallmark Consumer Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Go North Group nor Hallmark Consumer Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Go North Group nor Hallmark Consumer Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Go North Group nor Hallmark Consumer Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Go North Group nor Hallmark Consumer Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Go North Group nor Hallmark Consumer Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. Affected is an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPUserSetting. Performing manipulation of the argument delno results in stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. This impacts an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPServer. Such manipulation of the argument ip1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in omec-project UPF up to 2.1.3-dev. This affects the function handleSessionEstablishmentRequest of the file /pfcpiface/pfcpiface/messages_session.go of the component PFCP Session Establishment Request Handler. This manipulation causes null pointer dereference. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in floooh sokol up to 16cbcc864012898793cd2bc57f802499a264ea40. The impacted element is the function _sg_pipeline_desc_defaults in the library sokol_gfx.h. The manipulation results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The patch is identified as 5d11344150973f15e16d3ec4ee7550a73fb995e0. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in PbootCMS up to 3.2.12. The affected element is the function get_user_ip of the file core/function/handle.php of the component Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument X-Forwarded-For leads to use of less trusted source. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X