Comparison Overview

GMR Group

VS

VINCI

GMR Group

New Udaan Bhawan, New Delhi, Delhi, 110037, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

GMR Group is a leading global infrastructure conglomerate with significant expertise in airports, energy, transportation, and urban infrastructure. GMR Airports is Asia’s largest private airport operator with the world’s 2nd largest passenger handling capacity (over 100 million annually). It operates key airports like Delhi, India’s largest and fastest-growing airport, Hyderabad, an innovative greenfield airport, and New Goa, India's first destination airport. Expanding its overseas footprint, the company is developing Kualanamu International Airport in Medan, Indonesia, (with Angkasa Pura II) and provides technical services to the renowned Mactan Cebu International in the Philippines. The Group is also currently developing two major greenfield airport projects in India and Greece. As a pioneer in implementing the path-breaking Aerotropolis concept in India, GMR Airports is also developing unique airport cities around its airports in Delhi, Hyderabad, and Goa. GMR Aero Technic is India’s largest integrated world-class third-party MRO and provides complete technical support to aircraft operators. GMR’s energy businesses have an installed capacity of over 3,000 MW capacity. With a significant focus on green energy, the company fosters sustainability by harnessing the power of wind, water, and sun for energy generation. The Transportation and Urban Infrastructure division focuses on surface transport projects including Roads, Railways, and Airstrips/ Runways. The Group’s EPC business is working on the design and construction of the prestigious Eastern Dedicated Freight Corridor project of DFCCI (Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India). GMR Group is also developing a multi-focus Special Investment Region in Tamil Nadu. The GMR Varalakshmi Foundation, the group's CSR arm, aims to enhance people's lives by improving skills, education, and healthcare infrastructure, fostering a better quality of life generally wherever the Group has business presence.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 16,159
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

VINCI

Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 800 and 849

VINCI is a world leader in concessions, energy and construction, employing 280.000 people in some 120 countries. We design, finance, build and operate infrastructure and facilities that help improve daily life and mobility for all. Because we believe in all-round performance, above and beyond economic results, we are committed to operating in an environmentally and socially responsible manner. You can be part of projects that bring lasting change to urban ecosystems and entire regions. Join the team!

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 13,465
Subsidiaries: 134
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gmr-group.jpeg
GMR Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci.jpeg
VINCI
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GMR Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VINCI
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GMR Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VINCI in 2025.

Incident History — GMR Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GMR Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VINCI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VINCI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gmr-group.jpeg
GMR Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci.jpeg
VINCI
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: phishing, exploiting vulnerabilities, supply chain compromises, third-party breaches, cookie hijacking
Motivation: financial gain, operational disruption, geopolitical influence, strategic hybrid warfare
Blog: Blog

FAQ

VINCI company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GMR Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

VINCI company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas GMR Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, VINCI company and GMR Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

VINCI company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while GMR Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither VINCI company nor GMR Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither VINCI company nor GMR Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GMR Group company nor VINCI company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GMR Group nor VINCI holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

VINCI company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GMR Group company.

GMR Group company employs more people globally than VINCI company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither GMR Group nor VINCI holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GMR Group nor VINCI holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GMR Group nor VINCI holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GMR Group nor VINCI holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GMR Group nor VINCI holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GMR Group nor VINCI holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H