Comparison Overview

GMC Publications

VS

Amberley Publishing

GMC Publications

166 High St, None, Lewes, None, GB, BN7 1XU
Last Update: 2025-11-27

GMC Publications produces a wide range of books and magazine aimed at the craft, art, photography and lifestyle markets. The diverse range of subjects includes woodworking, DIY, gardening, cookery, art, puzzles, adult colouring, mindfulness, wellbeing and all manner of crafts – from knitting to jewellery making and upholstery to embroidery. Magazines include: Breathe, Teen Breathe, Zen Colouring, Outdoor Photography, Black+White Photography, Woodturning, Furniture & Cabinetmaking, Woodworking Crafts, Knitting Magazine and Factology. All are widely distributed and available in supermarkets and magazine retailers nationally and internationally.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Amberley Publishing

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Amberley Publishing is the UK's most innovative publisher of history, specialist interest and local history books. Based in the Cotswolds, Amberley provides a fresh approach to local and specialist history publishing, with a 2014 publishing programme of over 500 new titles including 150 in the full-colour Through Time series plus new titles in our Classic Guide to, Bradshaw's Guides, History Tour, and some fantastic Tudor, English and World History titles. All titles available from www.amberleybooks.com www.amazon.co.uk/amberleypublishing

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gmc-publications-uk.jpeg
GMC Publications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amberley-publishing.jpeg
Amberley Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GMC Publications
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Amberley Publishing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GMC Publications in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amberley Publishing in 2025.

Incident History — GMC Publications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GMC Publications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Amberley Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amberley Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gmc-publications-uk.jpeg
GMC Publications
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amberley-publishing.jpeg
Amberley Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Amberley Publishing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GMC Publications company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Amberley Publishing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GMC Publications company.

In the current year, Amberley Publishing company and GMC Publications company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Amberley Publishing company nor GMC Publications company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Amberley Publishing company nor GMC Publications company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Amberley Publishing company nor GMC Publications company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GMC Publications company nor Amberley Publishing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GMC Publications nor Amberley Publishing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GMC Publications company nor Amberley Publishing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GMC Publications company employs more people globally than Amberley Publishing company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither GMC Publications nor Amberley Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GMC Publications nor Amberley Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GMC Publications nor Amberley Publishing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GMC Publications nor Amberley Publishing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GMC Publications nor Amberley Publishing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GMC Publications nor Amberley Publishing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.