Comparison Overview

GM Wilson

VS

DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services

GM Wilson

1 Crown Court, Wakefield, WF1 2SU, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

G M Wilson solicitors has been successfully managing the legal affairs of private and commercial clients for over 30 years. Based at offices in Wakefield and Barnsley we offer an excellent standard of client care, outstanding legal advice and a comprehensive range of value for money services delivered by legal specialists who are experts in their field. You will find G M Wilson solicitors approachable, friendly and easy to deal with. We will not baffle you with jargon, just keep you fully informed about your legal position and options

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services

The Legal Center, Newark, NJ, 07102, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

DepoLink Court Reporting is a full service and technologically advanced court reporting firm. With true national reach DepoLink is poised to handle depositions throughout North America and abroad. DepoLink offers a more modern approach to the very antiquated service that older firms have gotten all to comfortable offering their clients. Very client focused DepoLink goes above and beyond and serves as a legal resource for its clients. We also offer a wide range of services not typically offered by most court reporting agencies. *** A RealLegal/LiveNote recommended court reporting agency ***

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gm-wilson.jpeg
GM Wilson
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GM Wilson
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GM Wilson in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services in 2025.

Incident History — GM Wilson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GM Wilson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gm-wilson.jpeg
GM Wilson
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/depolink-court-reporting-&-litigation-support-services.jpeg
DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services
Incidents

FAQ

GM Wilson company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GM Wilson company.

In the current year, DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services company and GM Wilson company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services company nor GM Wilson company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services company nor GM Wilson company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services company nor GM Wilson company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GM Wilson company nor DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GM Wilson nor DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GM Wilson company nor DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GM Wilson company employs more people globally than DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither GM Wilson nor DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GM Wilson nor DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GM Wilson nor DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GM Wilson nor DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GM Wilson nor DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GM Wilson nor DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X